Back

DMEM and EMEM are suitable surrogate media to mimic host environment and expand leptospiral pathogenesis studies using in vitro tools

Garcia, L.; Lin, Z.; Culos, S.; Muenker, M. C.; Johnson, E. E.; Wang, Z.; Lopez-Giraldez, F.; Giraud-Gatineau, A.; Jackson, A.; Picardeau, M.; Goodlett, D. R.; Townsend, J. P.; Petrosova, H.; Wunder, E. A.

2025-01-24 microbiology
10.1101/2025.01.22.634353 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pathogenic Leptospira species can survive and thrive in a wide range of environments. Distinct environments expose the bacteria to different temperatures, osmolarities, and amounts and sources of nutrition. However, leptospires are mostly cultured, in a laboratory setting under in vitro conditions that do not reflect natural environments. This constraint on laboratory cultures limits the applicability of in vitro studies to the understanding of even simple pathogenic processes. Here we report, investigate, and identify a medium and conditions that mimic the host environment during leptospirosis infection, expanding the available in vitro tools to evaluate leptospiral pathogenesis. We quantified genome-wide gene expression of pathogenic Leptospira interrogans cultured in different in vitro media compositions (EMJH, DMEM, EMEM, and HAN). Using EMJH as standard, we compared gene expression in these compositions to genome-wide gene expression gathered in a host environment: whole blood (WB) of hamsters after infection with pathogenic leptospires. Leptospires cultured in DMEM and EMEM media shared 40% and 47% of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of leptospires present within WB (FDR<0.01), while leptospires cultured in HAN media only shared 20% of DEGs with those from WB. Furthermore, gene and pathway expression of leptospires cultured on DMEM and EMEM media exhibited a better correlation with leptospires grown in WB, including promoting expression of a similar leptospiral lipid A profile to the one identified directly in host tissues. Taken together, these results indicate that commercial cell-culture media EMEM or DMEM are better surrogates for in vivo pathogenic studies than EMJH or HAN media in Leptospira. These alternative culture conditions, using media that are a standard supply worldwide, provide a reproducible and cost-effective approach that can accelerate research investigation and reduce the number of animal infections necessary for basic research of leptospirosis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
23.0%
2
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Virulence
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
21
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
25
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%