Back

Optimisation of skeletal muscle sampling for cultured fat production

Dohmen, R. G.; Hueber, R.; Martins, B.; Gouveia, M. A.; Zschieschang, S.; de Vries, M.; Eussen, R.; Caubergh, J.; Post, M. J.; Flack, J. E.

2025-01-23 cell biology
10.1101/2025.01.22.634340 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To produce cultured meat at a commercially-relevant scale, bioprocesses must be robust, standardised and cost-efficient. In this respect, the limited in vitro lifespan of primary cells poses a major challenge, which requires regular cell sourcing by means of biopsy. We have previously shown that muscle-derived fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells (FAPs) represent a promising starting cell type for cultured fat production. These cells proliferate for a high number of population doublings (PDs) in serum-free growth medium. However, with accumulating PDs, FAPs lose their adipogenic differentiation capacity, thereby limiting the amount of cultured fat that can be produced from a given starting sample. Donor animal characteristics, including age, may affect this loss of differentiation. Here, we performed a longitudinal biopsy study to ask whether physiological differences between donor animals are reflected in FAP cell biology, and if this has an effect on loss of FAP differentiation capacity. We sampled twelve Limousin cattle over the first two years of their lives, successfully performing 144 muscle biopsies. Animals younger than six months demonstrated higher FAP yields per gram of muscle tissue, making them ideal donors for cultured fat production, but we observed little difference in the proliferation or differentiation of derived cell cultures. This work also provides valuable insights into the tissue harvesting process, highlighting the need for new, robust and standardised biopsy systems to mitigate contamination risk.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
8
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
9
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
10
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
14
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
23
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%