Back

A strong relationship between environmental DNA metabarcoding and rank-based abundance of fish

Littlefair, J. E.; Hayhurst, L. D.; Yates, M. C.; Rennie, M. D.; Cristescu, M. E.

2025-01-24 ecology
10.1101/2025.01.22.634322 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIIncreasingly, molecular methods of species monitoring are integrated into freshwater biodiversity surveys and fisheries management. Inferring organism abundance or biomass from sequence counts derived from metabarcoding data has been an exciting but contentious concept in the biomonitoring community for some time. Although demonstrating a strong correlation with abundance has proven difficult, many researchers have assumed that quantitative metabarcoding data can at least provide broad-scale ranking of abundance. However, robust field validations of this widely-held assumption remain scarce. C_LIO_LIHere, we analyse metabarcoding read counts of fish eDNA data derived from 20 lakes and use betabinomial mixed effects models to compare this to rank abundance generated from long-term fish survey data. Rank abundance data for 18 species was generated within-species across-sites, meaning that ranks compare the abundance of the same species in different lakes. We also investigated a possible allometric effect on eDNA production by analysing a subset of data for effects of fish body mass on the amount of eDNA sequences. C_LIO_LIWe found a good relationship between species-specific eDNA sequences and within-species rank abundance categories for fishes, with rare fish producing 3% of sequences in a library, moderately abundant producing 7% and abundant fish producing 29%, according to model predictions. C_LIO_LIWe found a small negative effect of body mass on the amount of eDNA sequences, where the proportion of reads recovered significantly decreased with increased mean body mass of the population. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: The benefit of this approach is the potential for rapid assessment of rank abundance for multiple species, including smaller species which are often missed by conventional methods such as gillnetting, with relatively low amounts of additional effort. This approach will assist practitioners taking a species-based approach to freshwater habitat management in lakes worldwide. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
5
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.2%
19
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%