Back

Investigation of All Disease-Relevant Lysine Acetylation Sites in α-Synuclein Enabled by Non-canonical Amino Acid Mutagenesis

Shimogawa, M.; Li, M.-H.; Park, G. S. H.; Ramirez, J.; Lee, H.; Watson, P.; Sharma, S.; Lin, Z.; Peng, C.; Christianson, D. W.; Eliezer, D.; Rhoades, E.; Petersson, E. J.

2025-01-22 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.01.21.634178 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aggregates of -synuclein (S) are hallmarks of synucleinopathies, including Parkinsons Disease (PD) and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). We have recently shown that S lysine acetylation in the soluble monomer pool varies between healthy controls, PD, and MSA patients. To study the effects of lysine acetylation at all disease-relevant sites of S, we first compared production of acetylated S through either native chemical ligation or non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) mutagenesis. Since yields were comparable, ncAA mutagenesis was deemed superior for scanning many acetylation sites. We expressed and purified 12 disease-relevant variants and studied their binding to membranes as well as their aggregation propensities, and found that acetylation of lysine 12, 43, and 80 had particularly strong effects. To understand the implications for acetylation of monomeric S found in healthy cells, we performed NMR experiments to study protein conformation and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy experiments to quantify lipid binding. We also investigated the effects of acetylation at lysine 12, 43, and 80 on fibril seeding in neurons. Collectively, our biochemical and cell biological investigations indicated that acetylation of K80 could inhibit aggregation without conferring negative effects on monomer function in healthy cells. Therefore, we studied the structures of fibrils with K80 acetylation through cryo-electron microscopy to uncover the structural basis for these effects. Finally, we identified inhibition of HDAC8 as a way of potentially increasing acetylation at K80 and other inhibitory sites for therapeutic benefit.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.