Back

Genetic score associations with birthweight in preterm-born infants compared with term-born infants

Beaumont, R. N.; Kotecha, S. J.; Simpson, S. J.; Kotecha, S.; Freathy, R. N.

2025-01-28 pediatrics
10.1101/2025.01.21.25320880 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIn preterm infants, lower birthweight correlates with a higher risk of neonatal complications. Understanding the factors influencing birthweight in these infants is important as it may guide future antenatal and perinatal care. Genetic variants account for at least one-quarter of variation in birthweight in term-born infants, but the genetic contribution to birthweight in preterm infants is not well understood. We aimed to compare genetic score associations with birthweight in a well-powered sample of preterm infants with those in term-born infants. Study designWe used linear regression to test the association between birth weight and fetal genetic scores for birthweight (BW-GS) in a total of 1,416 preterm, singleton and 15,253 term, singleton infants. Analyses, adjusted for ancestry principal components were performed within each of 4 datasets and meta-analysed. ResultsIn term-born infants: a 1 SD higher BW-GS was associated with a 1.20 (95% CI 1.10-1.29) SD higher birthweight. In preterm infants, there was also strong evidence of association, but with a smaller effect size (0.76SD (0.41-1.11) higher birthweight per 1-SD higher BW-GS). In preterms, when stratifying by gestational duration, we found that the associations strengthened with increasing gestational duration. ConclusionsGenetic scores composed of variants identified in term-born infants also influenced birthweight in preterm infants. However, the associations had smaller effects in preterms and were weaker at earlier gestations. This suggests that while many of the same genetic factors influence birthweight in preterm and term-born infants, other factors (environmental, placental, different genetic) may be more important in preterms. Future well-powered studies are required to investigate this.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
5
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%