Evaluating the Efficacy of a Hybrid Physical Therapy Technology: A Pilot Study on Wearable Sleeves within a Veteran Patient Population
Truntzer, J.; Gorman, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionTraditional musculoskeletal rehabilitation presents a range of challenges that can hinder patient recovery. Cost, access and travel place a significant burden on many health care systems. We completed a pilot study using a wearable biosleeve to determine if such technology might help address many of the current challenges. MethodsPatients were enrolled following knee arthroscopy to receive hybrid physical therapy utilizing a wearable sleeve that tracks joint angles and biometrics in conjunction with a web-based platform that allows provider visibility to patient completion data for assigned protocols. ResultsTen patients, who completed a three-month rehabilitation program, experienced successful outcomes with no adverse events. No difference in adverse outcomes or failure to achieve acceptable motion was found in patients that completed hybrid therapy (in-person and digital) or digital-based therapy alone. ConclusionWhile larger studies are required, this study serves as an important launching point for the potential benefits of integrating wearable technology in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Design of a Clinical Balance Tool for Fall Risk Assessments: A Development and Usability Study 94%
- Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial on the Safety, Feasibility, and Usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton: A Comparative Study with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses 94%
- Biomechanical effects of adding an articulating toe joint to a passive foot prosthesis for incline and decline walking 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardizing Phenotypic Algorithms for the Classification of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tear from Electronic Health Record Systems 91%
- Adopting an American framework to optimize nursing admission documentation in an Australian health organization 87%
- Evaluation of a Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Wearable Data for Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 94%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 92%
- Kinematics associated with treadmill walking in Rett Syndrome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 91%
- Enhancing Palliative Care Registration Using an Automated Robotic Process with Clinician Validation: A PRADA Prospective Cohort Study. 89%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Operative Time and Blood Loss with the FFX(R) Device Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation During Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study 89%
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 88%
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.