Back

Identifying mood instability and circadian rest-activity patterns using digital remote monitoring and actigraphy in participants at risk for bipolar disorder

Panchal, P.; Nelissen, N.; McGowan, N.; Atkinson, L.; Saunders, K.; Harrison, P.; Rushworth, M. F.; Draschkow, D.; Geddes, J.; Nobre, A. C.; Harmer, C.

2025-01-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.20.633946 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mood instability and circadian rhythm disruptions are both of increasing interest with regard to a number of psychiatric disorders, notably bipolar disorder (BD), but understanding of their nature and their interrelationship are incomplete. By definition, both have an integral temporal component and, as such, measuring them longitudinally and remotely is desirable. We conducted the Cognition and Mood Evolution across Time (COMET) study to assess the feasibility and value of digital devices to capture mood, its instability, and daily rest-activity patterns, over a 10-week period, in two groups of participants. The first group (n=37) were selected as scoring >7 on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) ( high MDQ), thereby having a history of mood elevation and being at risk for BD. They were compared with a group (n=37) scoring <5 on the MDQ ( low MDQ). Over a 10-week period, using a tablet, mood was rated daily, clinical ratings of depression, mania, and anxiety were captured weekly via the True Colours app, and a GENEactiv actigraph was worn to capture rest-activity pattern data. The main findings are that (1) MDQ score predicts mood instability; (2) high MDQ score is associated with more negative affect and mood symptoms than people with low MDQ, and with a different circadian activity profile; and (3) mood instability and circadian indices appear uncorrelated. The implications are that (1) remote monitoring of these domains is feasible and valuable; (2) selection of participants based on MDQ score is useful for studying mood (in)stability; and (3) the approach has potential for studies of clinical populations and for experimental medicine studies assessing interventions to reduce mood instability.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
7
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
10
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
12
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
13
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%