Back

Trends and Disparities in Newer GLP1 Receptor Agonist Initiation among Real-World Adult Patients Eligible for Obesity Treatment

Radwan, R. M.; Lee, Y. A.; Kotecha, P.; Write, D.; Hernandez, I.; Ramon, R.; Donahoo, W. T.; Chen, Y.; Ellen, J.; Jiang, B.; Guo, J.

2025-01-20 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.01.20.25320839 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsTo characterize trends in the initiation of newer anti-obesity medications (AOMs) and determine factors associated with their use among obese/overweight populations. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study utilized electronic health record data from OneFlorida+ (2015-2024). Adults eligible for AOMs were included, defined as having a BMI [≥]30 kg/m{superscript 2} or a BMI of 27-29.9 kg/m{superscript 2} with at least one obesity-related comorbidity. The primary outcome was the initiation of newer AOMs, specifically glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) including liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide. Trends across years were examined, and a multivariable logistic regression identified sociodemographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization factors associated with AOM initiation. ResultsOf 319,949 adults, 1.8% initiated newer AOMs. Semaglutide accounted for 77.9% of initiations, tirzepatide 19.7%, and liraglutide 17.8%. Initiation trends showed liraglutide uptake peaked at 5% in 2018 but declined afterward, while semaglutide and tirzepatide uptake increased exponentially since 2022. Odds of initiation were lower for Black (aOR (95% CI): 0.87 [0.80- 0.94]) and Hispanic (0.84 [0.78-0.91]) groups vs. Whites, and for Medicaid (0.69 [0.63-0.76]) and uninsured (0.81 [0.74-0.87]) patients vs. privately insured. Higher odds were associated with being female, middle-aged, having more outpatient visits, and visiting endocrinologists. ConclusionsThe initiation of newer AOMs among overweight and obese populations remains low, but uptake has increased exponentially since 2022. Our findings reveal significant disparities in obesity care, highlighting the importance of addressing inequities in AOM access to improve obesity outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
4
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
8
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.5%
29
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%