Back

Trends and Disparities in Newer GLP1 Receptor Agonist Initiation among Real-World Adult Patients Eligible for Obesity Treatment

Radwan, R. M.; Lee, Y. A.; Kotecha, P.; Write, D.; Hernandez, I.; Ramon, R.; Donahoo, W. T.; Chen, Y.; Ellen, J.; Jiang, B.; Guo, J.

2025-01-20 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.01.20.25320839
Show abstract

AimsTo characterize trends in the initiation of newer anti-obesity medications (AOMs) and determine factors associated with their use among obese/overweight populations. Materials and methodsThis retrospective study utilized electronic health record data from OneFlorida+ (2015-2024). Adults eligible for AOMs were included, defined as having a BMI [≥]30 kg/m{superscript 2} or a BMI of 27-29.9 kg/m{superscript 2} with at least one obesity-related comorbidity. The primary outcome was the initiation of newer AOMs, specifically glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) including liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide. Trends across years were examined, and a multivariable logistic regression identified sociodemographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization factors associated with AOM initiation. ResultsOf 319,949 adults, 1.8% initiated newer AOMs. Semaglutide accounted for 77.9% of initiations, tirzepatide 19.7%, and liraglutide 17.8%. Initiation trends showed liraglutide uptake peaked at 5% in 2018 but declined afterward, while semaglutide and tirzepatide uptake increased exponentially since 2022. Odds of initiation were lower for Black (aOR (95% CI): 0.87 [0.80- 0.94]) and Hispanic (0.84 [0.78-0.91]) groups vs. Whites, and for Medicaid (0.69 [0.63-0.76]) and uninsured (0.81 [0.74-0.87]) patients vs. privately insured. Higher odds were associated with being female, middle-aged, having more outpatient visits, and visiting endocrinologists. ConclusionsThe initiation of newer AOMs among overweight and obese populations remains low, but uptake has increased exponentially since 2022. Our findings reveal significant disparities in obesity care, highlighting the importance of addressing inequities in AOM access to improve obesity outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.4%
13.7%
2
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 0.3%
10.5%
4
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 0.3%
7.8%
5
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 71%
4.6%
7
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
3.1%
8
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 36%
2.4%
11
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 6%
2.4%
12
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.8%
13
The Journal of Pediatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
14
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
15
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
17
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
21
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 28%
0.8%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
24
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
27
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 6%
0.7%