A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive analytics monitoring for early detection of clinical deterioration
Keim-Malpass, J.; Ratcliffe, S. J.; Clark, M. T.; Krahn, K. N.; Monfredi, O. J.; Hamil, S.; Yousevfand, G.; Jones, M. K.; Nelson, A.; Moorman, L. P.; Moorman, J. R.; Bourque, J. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis pragmatic randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the effect of a passive display of artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive analytics on hours free of clinical deterioration events among medical and surgical patients in an acute care cardiology medical-surgical ward. Methods10,422 inpatient visits were randomly assigned by cluster to the intervention group of a display of risk trajectories or to a control group of usual medical care. The trial was undertaken on an 85-bed inpatient cardiology and cardiac surgery ward of an academic hospital with a substantial implementation and education plan. This was a passive display with no specific response mandated. The primary analysis compared events of clinical deterioration (death, emergent ICU transfer, emergent endotracheal intubation, cardiac arrest, or emergent surgery) and compared mortality 21 days after admission. ResultsPatients with a large spike in risk score had, on average, twice the length of hospital stay (6.8 compared to 3.4 days). There was no change in the primary outcome between groups. Among those who had a clinical event, there were more event-free hours in the intervention/display-on group compared to the standard-of-care/display-off, but this did not approach statistical significance. 11% of patients were transferred into or out of display beds, a censoring event removing them from the analysis, thereby undermining aspects of the randomized nature of the study. ConclusionPredictive analytics monitoring incorporating continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring and displays of risk trajectories coupled with an education plan did not improve patient outcomes or reduce deaths. While necessary to conduct the study, the pragmatic design allowed for significant movement towards intervention/displayed beds for sicker patients. Design considerations in the future must focus on understanding clinicians interpretation, care processes, and communication practices. Trial registrationNCT04359641
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 96%
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- Clinical Utility of Automatable Prediction Models for Improving Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Outcomes: Towards Routine Decision Analysis Before Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 95%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 93%
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 93%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction 92%
- A comprehensive ML-based Respiratory Monitoring System for Physiological Monitoring & Resource Planning in the ICU 91%
- Bridging the Literacy Gap for Surgical Consents: An AI-Human Expert Collaborative Approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP): An Interpretable Machine Learning AutoScore–Derived Triage Tool for Predicting Mortality after Emergency Admissions 94%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 93%
- Consistency of performance of adverse outcome prediction models for hospitalized COVID-19 patients 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.