Back

Determinants of COPD Stage Progression and Regression: a Markov Transition Model Analysis of The COPDGene Cohort

Sanchez-Romero, L. M.; Brouwer, A. F.; Meza, R.; Levy, D. T.; Torres-Alvarez, R.; Han, M. K.

2025-01-24 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.01.17.25320745 medRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death but with variable progression. ObjectiveEstimate factors influencing transition rates between PRISm and GOLD stages. MethodsUsing a Markov multistate model, transition rates between GOLD-0, PRISm and GOLD-1, GOLD-2 and GOLD 3-4 were estimated for 5,728 US adult ever cigarette users from the COPDGene cohort over 10-years. We calculated one and five-year transition probabilities for progressive and regressive transitions and estimated the mean sojourn time for severity states. Main ResultsGOLD-1 and PRISm individuals spent the least time in any single stage (GOLD-1: 6 years; PRISm: 7 years). PRISm and GOLD-1 individuals were equally likely to transition to GOLD-2 vs. GOLD-0 (PRISm: HR 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.33, GOLD-1 (HR 1.15, 95%CI 0.93-1.42) per five-year period, but rarely transition between PRISm and GOLD-1. Individuals at GOLD-0 were equally likely to progress to GOLD-1 or PRISm (HR 1.11, 95%CI 0.93-1.31) but the transient time for this stage was the longest of any GOLD stage (16 years, 95%CI 15.2-17.3). GOLD-2 was the most likely stage to progress (HR 2.4, 95%CI 1.9-3.02) to GOLD 3-4 vs. regress to GOLD-1. For GOLD-2 individuals, current smoking status (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.67-1.06) or intensity (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.54-1.29) was not associated with disease progression. ConclusionsGOLD-1 and PRISm are the most transient stages equally likely to regress to GOLD-0 or progress to GOLD-2 and may benefit from smoking cessation interventions. GOLD-2 individuals are the most likely to progress and may benefit most from targeted disease interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.