Back

Tissue Region Segmentation In H&E-Stained Andihc-Stained Pathology Slides Of Specimens Fromdifferent Origins

Naghshineh Kani, S.; Soyak, B. C.; Gokce, M.; Duyar, Z.; Alicikus, H.; Yapicier, O.; Oner, M. U.

2025-01-17 pathology
10.1101/2025.01.16.25320663 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWWith the rise of digital pathology, integrating digital slides with deep learning-based decision support systems is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. Tissue region segmentation which is distinguishing tissue from background/artefacts, is an important pre-requisite in many digital pathology pipelines both for the laboratories as their first step in digitalizing the glass slides of tissue samples and turning them to whole slide images (WSIs) using scanners, and also for DL researches such as region-of-interest cropping, tumor detection, cell segmentation. However, it is well known that WSI scanners can fail in detecting all tissue regions, due to the tissue type, or due to weak staining and this is because of their not robust enough tissue detection algorithms which makes segmentation of WSIs a challenging task. Hence, this study develops a fast, lightweight, accurate, CPU-ready DL approach, enabling fast and reliable tissue region segmentation model by training and testing it across seven different institutional H&E and IHC stained WSIs to result a strong in generalization with the 22 to 56 s/WSI inference time using CPU that markedly outperforms classical OTSU thresholding, particularly in preserving challenging or faint tissue regions by achieving notably higher and more consistent performance than OTSU, with median Jaccard and Dice scores of approximately 0.86 and 0.92, respectively, compared to OTSU whcih was between 0.56 and 0.72. Our approach provides a practical, open-source solution for resource-limited pathology settings. We publicly released dataset obtained from Bahcesehir Medical School, and code to foster benchmarking and further advances in efficient, deployable computational pathology. The model could be used in digital slide scanners to improve the scanning process and in the pre-processing stages of DL pipelines to prepare high-quality datasets.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
3
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.3%
7
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
10
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
12
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
22
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%