Back

Tissue Region Segmentation In H&E-Stained Andihc-Stained Pathology Slides Of Specimens Fromdifferent Origins

Naghshineh Kani, S.; Soyak, B. C.; Gokce, M.; Duyar, Z.; Alicikus, H.; Yapicier, O.; Oner, M. U.

2025-01-17 pathology
10.1101/2025.01.16.25320663 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWWith the rise of digital pathology, integrating digital slides with deep learning-based decision support systems is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. Tissue region segmentation which is distinguishing tissue from background/artefacts, is an important pre-requisite in many digital pathology pipelines both for the laboratories as their first step in digitalizing the glass slides of tissue samples and turning them to whole slide images (WSIs) using scanners, and also for DL researches such as region-of-interest cropping, tumor detection, cell segmentation. However, it is well known that WSI scanners can fail in detecting all tissue regions, due to the tissue type, or due to weak staining and this is because of their not robust enough tissue detection algorithms which makes segmentation of WSIs a challenging task. Hence, this study develops a fast, lightweight, accurate, CPU-ready DL approach, enabling fast and reliable tissue region segmentation model by training and testing it across seven different institutional H&E and IHC stained WSIs to result a strong in generalization with the 22 to 56 s/WSI inference time using CPU that markedly outperforms classical OTSU thresholding, particularly in preserving challenging or faint tissue regions by achieving notably higher and more consistent performance than OTSU, with median Jaccard and Dice scores of approximately 0.86 and 0.92, respectively, compared to OTSU whcih was between 0.56 and 0.72. Our approach provides a practical, open-source solution for resource-limited pathology settings. We publicly released dataset obtained from Bahcesehir Medical School, and code to foster benchmarking and further advances in efficient, deployable computational pathology. The model could be used in digital slide scanners to improve the scanning process and in the pre-processing stages of DL pipelines to prepare high-quality datasets.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.0%
2
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.2%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
5
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
7
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.9%
20
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
24
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%