Tissue Region Segmentation In H&E-Stained Andihc-Stained Pathology Slides Of Specimens Fromdifferent Origins
Naghshineh Kani, S.; Soyak, B. C.; Gokce, M.; Duyar, Z.; Alicikus, H.; Yapicier, O.; Oner, M. U.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWWith the rise of digital pathology, integrating digital slides with deep learning-based decision support systems is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. Tissue region segmentation which is distinguishing tissue from background/artefacts, is an important pre-requisite in many digital pathology pipelines both for the laboratories as their first step in digitalizing the glass slides of tissue samples and turning them to whole slide images (WSIs) using scanners, and also for DL researches such as region-of-interest cropping, tumor detection, cell segmentation. However, it is well known that WSI scanners can fail in detecting all tissue regions, due to the tissue type, or due to weak staining and this is because of their not robust enough tissue detection algorithms which makes segmentation of WSIs a challenging task. Hence, this study develops a fast, lightweight, accurate, CPU-ready DL approach, enabling fast and reliable tissue region segmentation model by training and testing it across seven different institutional H&E and IHC stained WSIs to result a strong in generalization with the 22 to 56 s/WSI inference time using CPU that markedly outperforms classical OTSU thresholding, particularly in preserving challenging or faint tissue regions by achieving notably higher and more consistent performance than OTSU, with median Jaccard and Dice scores of approximately 0.86 and 0.92, respectively, compared to OTSU whcih was between 0.56 and 0.72. Our approach provides a practical, open-source solution for resource-limited pathology settings. We publicly released dataset obtained from Bahcesehir Medical School, and code to foster benchmarking and further advances in efficient, deployable computational pathology. The model could be used in digital slide scanners to improve the scanning process and in the pre-processing stages of DL pipelines to prepare high-quality datasets.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope 95%
- Deep Learning Based Registration of Serial Whole-slide Histopathology Images in Different Stains 95%
- A tool for federated training of segmentation models on whole slide images. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 96%
- A 3D CNN Classification Model for Accurate Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 using Computed Tomography Images 95%
- Predicting Primary Site of Secondary Liver Cancer with a Neural Estimator of Metastatic Origin (NEMO) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 93%
- Navigating the Multiverse: A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Selecting Harmonisation Methods for Multimodal Biomedical Data 93%
- tUbe net: a generalisable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Dataset for Nuclei and Tissue Segmentation in Melanoma with baseline nuclei segmentation and tissue segmentation benchmarks 96%
- SpheroScan: A User-Friendly Deep Learning Tool for Spheroid Image Analysis 95%
- CellBinDB: A Large-Scale Multimodal Annotated Dataset for Cell Segmentation with Benchmarking of Universal Models 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.