Back

Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study

Cooper, R. E.; Lyons, N.; Nicholls, V.; Foye, U.; Shah, P.; Mitchell, L.; Machin, K.; Chipp, B.; Grundy, A.; Pemovska, T.; Ahmed, N.; Appleton, R.; Repper, J.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Simpson, A.; Johnson, S.

2025-01-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.01.16.25320547 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeer support roles in mental health services are rapidly increasing in the UK and internationally. However, there is wide variation in these roles and limited research exploring the ways in which Peer Support Workers (PSWs) are currently working. We aimed to explore: 1) the distinctive features of PSWs approaches in mental healthcare; 2) the values underpinning the role and 3) the perceived impact of the role. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with paid mental health PSWs working across a range of settings. We took a co-produced, participatory approach: interviews were carried out by researchers with lived experience of mental health conditions and data were analysed using collaborative methods, guided by general principles of thematic analysis. ResultsWe interviewed 35 PSWs. Overarching themes identified from iterative analysis included: 1) The centrality of an individualised, flexible, approach, facilitating recovery through sharing lived experiences and building connection. PSWs advocated for service-user needs and most worked in non-clinical ways, offering holistic, recovery-orientated support. Tensions could arise with more clinical approaches. 2) Underpinning values included: i) Recovery is possible: bringing hope, role-modelling and encouraging change, ii) Mutuality: sharing lived experiences to bring empathy and build connection, iii) Person-centred approach: adapting ways of working to the individual, iv) Empowering instead of fixing service users. 3) the role had benefits for participants own recovery, although its emotional demands could lead to burnout. Participants thought that peer support helped service users feel understood, leading to greater openness and facilitating recovery, although some felt that it may not be right for everyone. Participants felt that PSWs could bring systemic improvements to services and use their lived experience to help teams -meet service user needs. ConclusionPSWs work in a range of ways, but, a unifying feature is a flexible, person-centred approach, facilitating recovery through shared lived experience. A range of potential benefits of peer work were identified for PSWs and for service users, as well as reports of positive systemic change. These could be facilitated by recovery-orientated models in services, space for shared learning with PSWs, and flexibility to incorporate PSWs unique ways of working.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
7
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
9
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
18
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
19
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
20
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%