Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study
Cooper, R. E.; Lyons, N.; Nicholls, V.; Foye, U.; Shah, P.; Mitchell, L.; Machin, K.; Chipp, B.; Grundy, A.; Pemovska, T.; Ahmed, N.; Appleton, R.; Repper, J.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Simpson, A.; Johnson, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPeer support roles in mental health services are rapidly increasing in the UK and internationally. However, there is wide variation in these roles and limited research exploring the ways in which Peer Support Workers (PSWs) are currently working. We aimed to explore: 1) the distinctive features of PSWs approaches in mental healthcare; 2) the values underpinning the role and 3) the perceived impact of the role. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with paid mental health PSWs working across a range of settings. We took a co-produced, participatory approach: interviews were carried out by researchers with lived experience of mental health conditions and data were analysed using collaborative methods, guided by general principles of thematic analysis. ResultsWe interviewed 35 PSWs. Overarching themes identified from iterative analysis included: 1) The centrality of an individualised, flexible, approach, facilitating recovery through sharing lived experiences and building connection. PSWs advocated for service-user needs and most worked in non-clinical ways, offering holistic, recovery-orientated support. Tensions could arise with more clinical approaches. 2) Underpinning values included: i) Recovery is possible: bringing hope, role-modelling and encouraging change, ii) Mutuality: sharing lived experiences to bring empathy and build connection, iii) Person-centred approach: adapting ways of working to the individual, iv) Empowering instead of fixing service users. 3) the role had benefits for participants own recovery, although its emotional demands could lead to burnout. Participants thought that peer support helped service users feel understood, leading to greater openness and facilitating recovery, although some felt that it may not be right for everyone. Participants felt that PSWs could bring systemic improvements to services and use their lived experience to help teams -meet service user needs. ConclusionPSWs work in a range of ways, but, a unifying feature is a flexible, person-centred approach, facilitating recovery through shared lived experience. A range of potential benefits of peer work were identified for PSWs and for service users, as well as reports of positive systemic change. These could be facilitated by recovery-orientated models in services, space for shared learning with PSWs, and flexibility to incorporate PSWs unique ways of working.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 97%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 96%
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 94%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 98%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 98%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 97%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.