Back

Protein-Formatted Biomarker Enrichment Tag for the Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen

Liu, C.; Barricella, S.; Cortez-Jugo, C.; Steer, D.; He, L.

2025-01-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.01.15.633204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The streptavidin-biotin interaction has long been a cornerstone of immunoassays, valued for its exceptionally high affinity and specificity, and has been widely used in routine diagnostic assays for decades. However, elevated biotin levels in plasma, often resulting from oral supplements, can interfere with streptavidin-biotin binding, compromising signal detection in these assays. To address this limitation, we present a biotin-insensitive antigen enrichment system based on the ultra-strong binding pair barnase (Bn) and barstar (Bs) for effective antigen capture. This high-affinity system enables efficient detection of nanobody-antigen complexes with picomolar sensitivity, as demonstrated by the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, CEACAM5). When paired with a fluorescent secondary nanobody reporter, the system achieved a detection limit as low as 98.9 pM, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 17.8 ng/mL, representing a four-order-of-magnitude improvement in sensitivity compared to light interferometry-based binding analysis. Both Bn and Bs are small (<15 kDa), single-chain proteins that can be generically incorporated into immunoactive molecules. Compared to the traditional biotin-streptavidin system, the Bn-Bs system offers enhanced specificity, improved stability, and reduced cost and complexity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Sensors
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
7
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.1%
8
Nature Nanotechnology
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Bioconjugate Chemistry
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
ACS Central Science
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Advanced Materials
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Lab on a Chip
● 96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Nanoscale
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Nanoscale Advances
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Chemical Communications
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Chemical Society
● 217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
ACS Applied Bio Materials
● 24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
23
Advanced Functional Materials
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
24
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
The Analyst
● 16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Advanced Healthcare Materials
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
ACS Omega
● 105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
29
RSC Chemical Biology
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Nature Chemistry
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.