Large Language Models Struggle to Encode Medical Concepts - A Multilingual Benchmarking and Comparative Analysis
Rouhizadeh, H.; Yazdani, A.; Zhang, B.; Vicente Alvarez, D.; Hueser, M.; Vanobberghen, A.; Yang, R.; Li, I.; Walter, A.; Teodoro, D.
Show abstract
Interoperability in health information systems is crucial for accurate data exchange across environments such as electronic health records, clinical notes, and medical research. The main challenge arises from the wide variation in biomedical concepts, their representation across different systems and languages, and the limited context, complicating data integration and standardization. Inspired by recent advances in large language models (LLMs), this study explores their potential role as biomedical knowledge engineers to (semi-)automate multilingual biomedical concept normalization, a key task for semantic interoperability of medical concepts. We developed a novel multilingual dataset comprising 59104 unique terms mapped to 27280 distinct biomedical concepts, designed to assess language model performance across this task within five European languages: English, French, German, Spanish, and Turkish. We then proposed a multi-stage pipeline based on a retrieve-then-rerank approach using sparse and dense retrievers, rerankers, and fusion approaches, leveraging discriminative and generative LLMs, with a predefined primary knowledge organization system. Our experiments show that the best discriminative model, e5, achieves an accuracy of 71%, surpassing the best generative model, Mistral, by 2% (p-value < 0.001). For semi-automated workflows, e5 maintained superior performance with 82% recall@10 versus Mistrals 78%. Our findings demonstrate a pathway to how LLM-based approaches can advance the normalization of multilingual biomedical terms as well as the limitations of LLMs in encoding biomedical concepts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MelAnalyze: Fact-Checking Melatonin claims using Large Language Models and Natural Language Inference 95%
- Evaluating Semantic Similarity Methods for Comparison of Text-derived Phenotype Profiles 95%
- Ontology-based expansion of virtual gene panels to improve diagnostic efficiency for rare genetic diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing neural language models for medical concept representation and patient trajectory prediction 96%
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 96%
- Intrinsic-Dimension analysis for guiding dimensionality reduction and data fusion in multi-omics data processing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools 96%
- LCD Benchmark: Long Clinical Document Benchmark on Mortality Prediction for Language Models 96%
- A Novel Question-Answering Framework for Automated Abstract Screening Using Large Language Models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Concept Embedding for Feature Engineering in Phenotyping 96%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 96%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.