Back

Leveraging ancestral recombination graphs for quantitative genetic analysis of rice yield in indica and japonica subspecies

Rebollo, I.; Tolhurst, D.; Obsteter, J.; Rosas, J. E.; Gorjanc, G.

2025-01-20 genetics
10.1101/2025.01.14.633033 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) has two main subspecies, indica and japonica, which coexist in many regions but are often treated separately during breeding. Combining both subspecies in quantitative genetic analyses could enhance genetic improvement, however, this requires appropriately modelling their genetic history. The ancestral recombination graph (ARG) is an effective population genetics tool that comprehensively and succinctly represents a species genetic history. This study evaluated the use of an ARG, encoded as a tree sequence, to improve quantitative genetic analyses of indica and japonica rice. Using data from Uruguays National Rice Breeding Program, we inferred ancestral alleles, constructed and dated an ARG, and examined its application in genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies. We compared the predictive ability of a branch-based relationship matrix (BRM) built from an ARG against conventional relationship matrices from pedigree and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) site data. We then estimated BRMs SNP site effects to identify potential sites of interest and better understand how these map onto the tree sequence branches. The results showed that the ARG captured key biological signals, encoded genomic data more efficiently than conventional formats, and resulted in the highest predictive ability when combining both subspecies. Although the ARG-based approach did not substantially outperform conventional approaches for between-species prediction, this approach holds promise for plant breeding with larger datasets and could enhance genome-wide association studies by elucidating haplotype ancestry and the evolution of their value. Overall, our results demonstrated the potential of ARGs for the quantitative genetic analysis of diverse populations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.6%
3
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
8
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
29
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%