The Landscape of Shared and Divergent Genetic Influences across 14 Psychiatric Disorders
Grotzinger, A. D.; Werme, J.; Peyrot, W. J.; Frei, O.; de Leeuw, C.; Bicks, L. K.; Guo, Q.; Margolis, M. P.; Coombes, B. J.; Batzler, A.; Pazdernik, V.; Biernacka, J. M.; Andreassen, O.; Antilla, V.; Borglum, A.; Cai, N.; Demontis, D.; Edenberg, H.; Faraone, S. V.; Franke, B.; Gandal, M.; Gelernter, J.; Hettema, J. M.; Jonas, K.; Knowles, J. A.; Koenen, K. C.; Maihofer, A. X.; Mallard, T. T.; Mattheisen, M.; Mitchell, K. S.; Neale, B.; Nievergelt, C. M.; Nurnberger, J. I.; O'Connell, K. S.; Robinson, E.; Sanchez-Roige, S. S.; Santangelo, S. L.; Stefansson, H.; Stefansson, K.; Stein, M. B.; Str
Show abstract
Psychiatric disorders display high levels of comorbidity and genetic overlap1,2. Genomic methods have shown that even for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, two disorders long-thought to be etiologically distinct3, the majority of genetic signal is shared4. Furthermore, recent cross-disorder analyses have uncovered over a hundred pleiotropic loci shared across eight disorders5. However, the full scope of shared and disorder-specific genetic basis of psychopathology remains largely uncharted. Here, we address this gap by triangulating across a suite of cutting-edge statistical genetic and functional genomic analyses applied to 14 childhood- and adult-onset psychiatric disorders (1,056,201 cases). Our analyses identify and characterize five underlying genomic factors6 that explain the majority of the genetic variance of the individual disorders ([~]66% on average) and are associated with 268 pleiotropic loci. We observed particularly high levels of polygenic overlap7 and local genetic correlation8 and very few disorder-specific loci9 for two factors defined by: (i) schizophrenia and bipolar disorder ("SB factor"), and by (ii) major depression, PTSD, and anxiety ("internalizing factor"). At the functional level, we applied multiple methods10-12 which demonstrated that the shared genetic signal across the SB factor was substantially enriched in genes expressed in excitatory neurons, whereas the internalizing factor was associated with oligodendrocyte biology. By comparison, the genetic signal shared across all 14 disorders was enriched for broad biological processes (e.g., transcriptional regulation). These results indicate increasing differentiation of biological function at different levels of shared cross-disorder risk, from quite general vulnerability to more specific pathways associated with subsets of disorders. These observations may inform a more neurobiologically valid psychiatric nosology and implicate novel targets for therapeutic developments designed to treat commonly occurring comorbid presentations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic neurodevelopmental clustering and dyslexia 96%
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 95%
- DNA methylation and general psychopathology in childhood: An epigenome-wide meta-analysis from the PACE consortium 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A statistical method for image-mediated association studies discovers genes and pathways associated with four brain disorders 95%
- Genetic structure correlates with ethnolinguistic diversity in eastern and southern Africa 94%
- Genome-wide prediction of dominant and recessive neurodevelopmental disorder risk genes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- GWAS of Over 427,000 Individuals Establishes GABAergic and Synaptic Molecular Pathways as Key for Cognitive Executive Functions 96%
- Sex-Dependent Shared and Non-Shared Genetic Architecture Across Mood and Psychotic Disorders 96%
- Polygenic analyses show important differences between MDD symptoms collected using PHQ9 and CIDI-SF 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.