Rehabilitation your way: A randomized trial comparing home-based and self-managed web versus paper programs to improve arm and hand function after stroke
Westlake, K. P.; McCombe Waller, S.; Magder, L. S.; Akinlosotu, R.; Udo, J.; Burridge, J.; Whitall, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundHome-based, self-managed stroke rehabilitation can complement limited healthcare resources. Computer-based programs offer a potential for rehabilitation without the need for complex technology or direct therapist supervision. ObjectiveTo compare effectiveness of a home-based web rehabilitation program (STRONG) versus a paper exercise program (PEP) for stroke-related upper extremity disability. MethodsIn this single-blind randomized controlled trial 43 participants with stroke were stratified by motor ability and motivation, then randomly assigned to either STRONG (n=22) or PEP (n=21). Training consisted of a 6-week intervention phase (at least 1 hour daily, 5 days weekly), followed by a 6-week follow-up phase with optional training. Primary outcomes were Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA) and the streamlined timed Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT-T). Secondary outcomes Motor Activity Log (MAL), WMFT-Function (WMFT-F), Stroke Motivation Scale, and Self-Efficacy Scale. ResultsNeither program showed superiority in FMA or WMFT-T. Within-group FMA improvements were similar (Strong: 1.8 points vs PEP: 2.1 points at post-training; 3.3 vs 1.9 at follow-up). However, STRONG participants reported better arm and hand use in daily activities (MAL) at post-training and follow-up. Additionally, STRONG participants showed higher self-efficacy at post-training, though this difference was not maintained at follow-up. ConclusionBoth programs led to modest motor improvements. While STRONG did not outperform PEP in the primary outcomes, participants reported using their affected arm and hand more in daily activities and higher program continuation after the intervention period. Results suggest that home-based, self-managed rehabilitation combining exercises with daily tasks appears beneficial for stroke survivors post-standard rehabilitation. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03484182
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Postural control telerehabilitation with a low-cost virtual reality protocol for children with cerebral palsy: Protocol for a clinical trial 96%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 96%
- Investigating the optimal reactive balance training intensity in people with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomized control trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 96%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 96%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 96%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 95%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 97%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 92%
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.