Back

Piezo ion channel activation increases the release of therapeutic extracellular vesicles after mechanical stimulation in bioreactors

Andrade, A. C.; Le Goas, O.; Lemieux, S.; Grangier, A.; Nicolai, A.; Guerrera, C.; Ribes, C.; Suply, E.; Volatron, J.; Gazeau, F.; Silva, A. K. A.

2025-02-24 cell biology
10.1101/2025.01.09.632205 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enhancing protocols and methods for producing therapeutic extracellular vesicles (EVs) in bioreactors is crucial to achieve scalable production while ensuring both quality and quantity. Studies have shown that mechanical stress can promote EV release, although the underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear. Here we investigated which mechanisms are responsible for the increase of EV production under shear stress. EVs were produced from adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ASCs), also described as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) that can support the regeneration of injured tissues via several paracrine factors. The cultures were treated with GsMTx4, an inhibitor which blocks the Piezo1 ion channels, or with YODA1, its agonist, to assess if mechanical or shear forces pathways are involved in enhancing the EV release. EVs were quantified and characterized after high shear (HS) stimulation compared with no shear stress stimulation (3D) and standard cultures methods (2D). These experiments showed that, after mechanical stimulation by shear stress, EV production increased in bioreactors and this effect was blocked by the inhibition of Piezo1 ion channels with GsMTx4 (88%) with no impact on cell viability. Consistently, the agonist YODA1 increased the EV production (149%). The implications of these findings are significant, especially for regenerative medicine and cellular therapies, where the efficient production of high-quality EVs is crucial. By understanding turbulence-induced shear stress and the natural mechanotransductive pathways within cells, it may be possible to optimize the production of therapeutic EVs, paving the way for more effective treatments in the future.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.3%
2
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.3%
3
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
7
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
8
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
17
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%