Back

Origin of subgenomes in the circumboreal allopolyploid carnivorous plant Drosera anglica (Droseraceae)

Mohn, R.; Yang, Y.

2025-01-13 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.01.09.632192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Premise of StudyThe parentage of a widespread member of the carnivorous sundew genus Drosera, the allopolyploid Drosera anglica, remains uncertain despite over 100 years of morphological, cytological, and, more recently, molecular study. MethodsUsing transcriptomic and genomic data from 12 species Drosera sect. Drosera including four D. anglica populations and a disjunct Idaho population of D. intermedia, we assembled genes in HybPiper and phased sequences in HybPhaser. We estimated heterozygosity and generated flow cytometry data to assess ploidy levels. We estimated species relationships with phylogenetic and pairwise genetic distance methods. Additionally, we assembled rbcL and ITS reads to compare to previous data. Key ResultsSequences from phased subgenomes highly supported D. anglica as sister to D. rotundifolia and D. linearis, differing from previous analyses based on chromosome pairing and Sanger sequencing with limited taxon sampling. Both ITS and rbcL sequences of D. anglica were the most similar to D. linearis. Drosera anglica is intermediate between both parents in leaf shape and microhabitat; however, across D. sect. Drosera, neither leaf shape nor biogeographic distribution were reliable indicators of phylogenetic relationships. Despite a range-wide sampling, we did not find evidence for multiple origins of D. anglica. Additionally, we confirmed that the Idaho population previously identified as D. intermedia is D. anglica. ConclusionsDrosera anglica arose from allopolyploidy between D. linearis (the chloroplast donor) and D. rotundifolia. Our study demonstrates the importance of taxon sampling and careful examining complex phylogenomic data, and presents an exemplar of analyzing allopolyploid relationships in plant lineages.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
21
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%