Determining off-target effects of splice-switching antisense oligonucleotides using short read RNAseq in neuronally differentiated human induced pluripotent stem cells
Kuijper, E. C.; van der Graaf, L.; Pepers, B. A.; Ramos, M. G.; Korhorn, S.; Toonen, L. J. A.; Cats, D.; Buijsen, R. A. M.; Mina, E.; Mei, H.; van Roon-Mom, W. M. C.
Show abstract
Antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) are small pieces of chemically modified DNA or RNA that bind to RNA in a sequence-specific manner based on Watson-Crick base-pairing. Splice-switching AONs are designed to modulate pre-mRNA splicing, thereby for instance restoring protein expression or modifying the eventual protein to restore its function or reduce its toxicity. Given the current lack of in silico methods that adequately predict off-target splicing events, assessment of off-target effects of AONs in human cells using RNAseq could be a promising approach. The identification and prioritization of potential off-target effects for validation and further investigation into the biological relevance would contribute to the development of safe and effective AONs. In this study, we used three different splice-switching AONs targeting three different human transcripts to study their transcriptome-wide, hybridization-dependent off-target effects with short read RNAseq. Using the computational tools rMATS and Whippet, we identified differential splicing events of which only a minority could be explained by hybridization, illustrating the difficulty of predicting off-target effects based on sequence homology. The main splicing events could all be validated with RT-PCR. Furthermore, from the three AONs studied, one AON induced considerably more changes in gene expression and splicing compared to the two other AONs assessed, which was confirmed in a validation experiment. Our study demonstrates that the interpretation of short read RNAseq data to determine off-target effects is challenging. Nonetheless, we showed that valuable results can be obtained as it allows the comparison of toxicity between different AONs within an experiment and identification of AON-specific off-target profiles.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptome analysis reveals higher levels of mobile element-associated abnormal gene transcripts in temporal lobe epilepsy patients 92%
- Identification of characteristic genomic markers in human hepatoma Huh7 and Huh7.5.1-8 cell lines 92%
- Global increase in circRNA levels in myotonic dystrophy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circular RNA Pde4dip regulates myogenesis by interacting with Zfp143 mRNA: A novel regulatory axis 94%
- DMD antisense oligonucleotide mediated exon skipping efficiency is affected by flanking intron retention time and target position within the exon 94%
- Direct RNA-RNA interaction between Neat1 and RNA targets, as a mechanism for RNAs paraspeckle retention 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long non-coding RNA expression levels modulate cell-type specific splicing patterns by altering their interaction landscape with RNA-binding proteins 95%
- Estimating allele-specific expression of SNVs from 10x Genomics Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data 93%
- Analysis of nucleotide variations in human g-quadruplex forming regions associated with disease states 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A CRISPR-dCas13 RNA-editing tool to study alternative splicing 95%
- HRT Atlas v1.1 database: redefining human and mouse housekeeping genes and candidate reference transcripts by mining massive RNA-seq datasets 93%
- Nanopore direct RNA sequencing detects differential expression between human cell populations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- KOnezumi-AID: A Software to Automate the Design of Multiplex Knockouts Using Target-AID 93%
- The Exon Junction Complex Core Represses Caner-specific Mature mRNA Re-splicing: A Potential Key Role in Terminating Splicing 92%
- Identification of ATP2B4 regulatory element containing functional genetic variants associated with severe malaria 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.