Modeling tumor dynamics and predicting response to chemo-, targeted-, and immune-therapies in a murine model of pancreatic cancer
Vishwanath, K.; Choi, H.; Gupta, M.; Zhou, R.; Sorace, A. G.; Yankeelov, T. E.; Lima, E. A. B. F.
Show abstract
We seek to establish a parsimonious mathematical framework for understanding the interaction and dynamics of the response of pancreatic cancer to the NGC triple chemotherapy regimen (mNab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin), stromal-targeting drugs (calcipotriol and losartan), and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1). We developed a set of ordinary differential equations describing changes in tumor size (growth and regression) under the influence of five cocktails of treatments. Model calibration relies on three tumor volume measurements obtained over a 14-day period in a genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model (KrasLSLG12D-Trp53LSLR172H-Pdx1-Cre). Our model reproduces tumor growth in the control and treatment scenarios with an average concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.99{+/-}0.01. We conduct leave-one-out predictions (average CCC=0.74{+/-}0.06), mouse-specific predictions (average CCC=0.75{+/-}0.02), and hybrid, group-informed, mouse-specific predictions (average CCC=0.85{+/-}0.04). The developed mathematical model demonstrates high accuracy in fitting the experimental tumor data and a robust ability to predict tumor response to treatment. This approach has important implications for optimizing combination NGC treatment strategies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An experimental-mathematical approach to predict tumor cell growth as a function of glucose availability in breast cancer cell lines 95%
- A 3D brain unit model to further improve prediction of local drug distribution within the brain 94%
- Targeting Oncogenic Mutations in Colorectal Cancer using Cryptotanshinone 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.