Back

Risk of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Patients With Cardiac Disease

Jones Pullins, M. E.; Quist-Nelson, J.; Fuller, M.; Volz, E.; Snow, S.; Habib, A.; Federspiel, J.; Boggess, K. A.; Meng, M.-L.

2025-01-05 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.01.03.25319981 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPregnant patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) face increased risk of preeclampsia and preterm delivery, yet data is limited data regarding degree of risk and impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) on gestational age at delivery. ObjectivesTo examine HDP risk and impact on delivery timing in patients with CVD. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years old who delivered between 10/1/2015 and 12/31/2020 using the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients with CVD were divided into six categories: congenital, ischemic, aortic pathology, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and valvular disease. The primary outcome was risk of HDP (gestational hypertension/ preeclampsia). The secondary outcome was gestational age at delivery. Multivariable mixed effects regression models were used to estimate adjusted outcomes, adjusting for CVD subtype, >1 CVD subtype present, demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities. ResultsAmong 4,606,247 obstetric patients, 20,021 had CVD. The risk of HDP among people with CVD varied by CVD subtype, lowest in those with congenital heart disease (aOR,0.9; 95% CI [0.8, 1.0]) and highest in those with pulmonary hypertension (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI [1.3, 1.8]) and cardiomyopathy (aOR,1.5; 95% CI [1.4,1.6]). Patients with CVD delivered earlier than those without CVD, even in the absence of HDP(36.4-38.0 weeks versus 38.4 weeks). Among those with HDP, patients with severe pre-eclampsia with CVD, delivered earlier than those without CVD (33.1-34.6 weeks versus 35.5 weeks). ConclusionRisk of HDP and preterm delivery is higher those with CVD, particularly in pulmonary hypertension and cardiomyopathy. Patients with CVD should be advised of their increased risk.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.6%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
11
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
13
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%