Identifying Psychiatric Manifestations in Outpatients with Depression and Anxiety: A Large Language Model-Based Approach
Xu, S.; Yan, Y.; Li, F.; Zhang, S.; Tang, H.; Luo, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Mei, Y.; Gu, W.; Qiu, H.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Yang, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Geng, H.; Han, Y.; Shao, J.; Opel, N.; Bing, L.; Zhao, M.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Chen, J.
Show abstract
PurposeAccurate psychiatric diagnosis and assessment are crucial for effective treatment. However, while current data-driven approaches emphasize diagnostic outcomes, the process of decoding the underlying symptom expressions in patients language and mapping them to well-defined psychiatric terminology has received relatively little attention. This study investigates the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the identification of diagnostic categories and symptoms from psychiatrist-patient dialogues, to provide interpretable insights and support automatic diagnosis. MethodsWe analyzed audio recordings from 1160 psychiatric diagnostic interviews, primarily involving patients with depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. A clinical entities corpus was formed by leveraging clinical annotations in EMRs (e.g., chief complaints, mental status, elements in assessment scales) and widely used assessment scales. LLMs were utilized to identify clinical symptoms, rate assessment scales, and an ensemble learning pipeline was designed to classify diagnostic results and symptoms with 10-fold cross-validation. ResultsThe system achieved 86.9% accuracy for identifying the appearance of clinical annotations and 74.7% (77.2%) accuracy for identifying anxiety (depression) symptoms. Patients with depression and anxiety, diagnosed using ICD-10 codes, were differentiated with an accuracy of 75.5%. Analysis of LLM-generated features shows that depression cases exhibited prominent markers of anhedonia and decreased volition, whereas anxiety disorders were characterized by tension and an inability to relax. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of integrating LLM technology with linguistic and acoustic features to enhance psychiatric diagnostics. The developed pipeline effectively predicts psychiatric diagnoses and provides interpretable insights, showcasing a valuable tool for clinicians in mental health assessment.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Psychiatric Illness Through Natural Language Processing (UNDERPIN): Rationale, Design, and Methodology 94%
- Bridging Structural MRI with Cognitive Function for Individual Level Classification of Early Psychosis via Deep Learning 92%
- Deep Multimodal Representations and Classification of First-Episode Psychosis via Live Face Processing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The ChAMP App: A Scalable mHealth Technology for Detecting Digital Phenotypes of Early Childhood Mental Health 92%
- Deep Sentiment Classification and Topic Discovery on Novel Coronavirus or COVID-19 Online Discussions: NLP Using LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Approach 92%
- Evaluating Explanations from AI Algorithms for Clinical Decision-Making: A Social Science-based Approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of Visual and Auditory Digital Markers of Suicidality in Acutely Suicidal Psychiatric In-Patients 93%
- Uncovering social states in healthy and clinical populations using digital phenotyping and Hidden Markov Models 92%
- Developing an automatic system for classifying chatter about health services from Twitter: A case study for Medicaid 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 96%
- Remote digital measurement of visual and auditory markers of Major Depressive Disorder severity and treatment response. 91%
- Precision Digital Intervention for Depression Based on Social Rhythm Principles Adds Significantly to Outpatient Treatment 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.