Back

Identifying Psychiatric Manifestations in Outpatients with Depression and Anxiety: A Large Language Model-Based Approach

Xu, S.; Yan, Y.; Li, F.; Zhang, S.; Tang, H.; Luo, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Mei, Y.; Gu, W.; Qiu, H.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Yang, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Geng, H.; Han, Y.; Shao, J.; Opel, N.; Bing, L.; Zhao, M.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Chen, J.

2025-01-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.01.03.24318117 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAccurate psychiatric diagnosis and assessment are crucial for effective treatment. However, while current data-driven approaches emphasize diagnostic outcomes, the process of decoding the underlying symptom expressions in patients language and mapping them to well-defined psychiatric terminology has received relatively little attention. This study investigates the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the identification of diagnostic categories and symptoms from psychiatrist-patient dialogues, to provide interpretable insights and support automatic diagnosis. MethodsWe analyzed audio recordings from 1160 psychiatric diagnostic interviews, primarily involving patients with depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. A clinical entities corpus was formed by leveraging clinical annotations in EMRs (e.g., chief complaints, mental status, elements in assessment scales) and widely used assessment scales. LLMs were utilized to identify clinical symptoms, rate assessment scales, and an ensemble learning pipeline was designed to classify diagnostic results and symptoms with 10-fold cross-validation. ResultsThe system achieved 86.9% accuracy for identifying the appearance of clinical annotations and 74.7% (77.2%) accuracy for identifying anxiety (depression) symptoms. Patients with depression and anxiety, diagnosed using ICD-10 codes, were differentiated with an accuracy of 75.5%. Analysis of LLM-generated features shows that depression cases exhibited prominent markers of anhedonia and decreased volition, whereas anxiety disorders were characterized by tension and an inability to relax. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of integrating LLM technology with linguistic and acoustic features to enhance psychiatric diagnostics. The developed pipeline effectively predicts psychiatric diagnoses and provides interpretable insights, showcasing a valuable tool for clinicians in mental health assessment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.5%
3
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
9
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%