Self-other mentalizing and attachment insecurity in the dimensional model of personality disorders: From research to clinical practice
Janczak, M. O.; Gorska, D.; Jurek, P.; Taubner, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundResearch on different aspects of mentalizing is essential for understanding the mechanisms underlying personality disorders (PD) and informing psychotherapy approaches, where mentalizing functions as a key mechanism of change. This study aimed to explore whether self- and other-mentalizing, in interaction with attachment insecurity, differentially explain Criteria A (level of personality functioning) and B (maladaptive traits) of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in the DSM-5. MethodOur sample consisted of 109 participants (54% female, 41% male, 5% nonbinary). We used The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders, A Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, the Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised, The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale, and The Personality Inventory for DSM-5. ResultsRegression analyses show that self-mentalizing deficits uniquely predict both Criterion A domains (self and interpersonal functioning) and all five maladaptive traits, while other-mentalizing is relevant only to interpersonal functioning. Explained variance (adjusted R{superscript 2}) ranges from 55% to 18%. Additionally, mentalization moderates the relationship between insecure attachment and personality pathology (Interpersonal functioning, Negative Affectivity and Detachment), mainly with greater mentalization deficits linked to more severe personality dysfunction under heightened attachment insecurity. ConclusionOur findings authorize mentalizing as a crucial factor in PD, supporting the potential value of mentalization-focused interventions in addressing both the severity and the "flavor" of PD. Notably, our findings suggest a hierarchy within self- and other-mentalizing, indicating that self-mentalizing plays a more foundational role in PD. Through a comprehensive, multi-method assessment of mentalization, this study offers a refined understanding of its role in psychopathology, providing valuable insights that could guide the development of more targeted therapeutic interventions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotion regulation and cognitive function as mediating factors for the association between lifetime abuse and risky behaviors in women of color 93%
- The association between stigmatizing attitudes towards depression and help seeking attitudes in college students 93%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 92%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 91%
- Short-term functional outcome in psychotic patients. Results of the Turku Early Psychosis Study (TEPS) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-differences in determinants of suicide risk preceding psychiatric admission: An electronic medical record study 93%
- Reduced loss aversion in subclinical negative symptoms and hypomania 92%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.