Back

Proposing a Weight-Based Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for Estimating Discrete-Time Markov Transition Probability Matrices with a Proof-of-Concept Example in Health Technology Assessment

Bollee, M.; Dutta Majumdar, A.

2025-01-02 health economics
10.1101/2025.01.02.25319899 medRxiv
Show abstract

Discrete-time Markov cohort-state transition models are now well-established as the preferred choice of analysts across application areas including health technology assessment. This preference arises out of its relative intuition and its capability to strike a fine balance between complex disease pathways, statistical precision, and parsimony although being criticized by a wide variety of stakeholders. Transition probability matrices (TPMs) are the "heart and soul" of such models responsible for estimating patient dispositions. However, estimating such TPMs comes with its own set of challenges. In some situations, the transition data may be censored such that the health state of a patient is unknown for multiple time steps before the next observation or data immaturity especially in rare diseases. Craig and Sendi proposed the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm using uniform weights as a solution for unequal estimation intervals for partially observed data. However, this typically comes at the cost of increased within-state output variations with no optimization technique available in the literature. The objective of this paper is to explore an optimized weighted version of the original EM algorithm, that aims to estimate the set of weights which minimizes the uncertainty of the estimated TPM against a target objective function. The weighting reduces the uncertainty of the estimate by considering the difference in temporal sparsity of the data when there are missing time steps. Further, we demonstrate the applicability of this weighting method using a fictitious cost-effectiveness model with our approach, showing a fine but definitive change over the original approach.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
4
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
7
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
29
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%