Proposing a Weight-Based Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for Estimating Discrete-Time Markov Transition Probability Matrices with a Proof-of-Concept Example in Health Technology Assessment
Bollee, M.; Dutta Majumdar, A.
Show abstract
Discrete-time Markov cohort-state transition models are now well-established as the preferred choice of analysts across application areas including health technology assessment. This preference arises out of its relative intuition and its capability to strike a fine balance between complex disease pathways, statistical precision, and parsimony although being criticized by a wide variety of stakeholders. Transition probability matrices (TPMs) are the "heart and soul" of such models responsible for estimating patient dispositions. However, estimating such TPMs comes with its own set of challenges. In some situations, the transition data may be censored such that the health state of a patient is unknown for multiple time steps before the next observation or data immaturity especially in rare diseases. Craig and Sendi proposed the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm using uniform weights as a solution for unequal estimation intervals for partially observed data. However, this typically comes at the cost of increased within-state output variations with no optimization technique available in the literature. The objective of this paper is to explore an optimized weighted version of the original EM algorithm, that aims to estimate the set of weights which minimizes the uncertainty of the estimated TPM against a target objective function. The weighting reduces the uncertainty of the estimate by considering the difference in temporal sparsity of the data when there are missing time steps. Further, we demonstrate the applicability of this weighting method using a fictitious cost-effectiveness model with our approach, showing a fine but definitive change over the original approach.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo methods for the calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information 94%
- A Tutorial on Discrete Event Simulation Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example 92%
- Pricing Treatments Cost-Effectively When They Have Multiple Indications: Not Just a Simple Threshold Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emerging Therapies for COVID-19: the value of information from more clinical trials 93%
- Statistical Decision Properties of Imprecise Trials Assessing COVID-19 Drugs 92%
- New IPECAD open-source model framework for the health technology assessment of early Alzheimer’s disease treatment: development and use cases 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate Prediction of Breast Cancer Survival through Coherent Voting Networks with Gene Expression Profiling 91%
- Selecting the most important self-assessed features for predicting conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment with Random Forest and Permutation-based methods 91%
- Reinforcement learning derived chemotherapeutic schedules for robust patient-specific therapy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal policy determination in sequential systemic and locoregional therapy of oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas: A patient-physician digital twin dyad with deep Q-learning for treatment selection 92%
- Optimizing the Implementation of Clinical Predictive Models to Minimize National Costs: A Sepsis Case Study 92%
- Empirical Sample Size Determination for Popular Classification Algorithms in Clinical Research 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.