Impact of Mydriasis on Image Gradability and Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with a Handheld Camera in Real-World Settings
Diogenes Azevedo Costa, I.; Restrepo, D.; Zago Ribeiro, L.; Aragaki, A. K.; Malerbi, F. K.; Regatieri, C.; Nakayama, L. F.
Show abstract
PurposeDiabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) faces challenges due to limited access to specialized care. Portable retinal cameras provide a practical alternative, but image quality, influenced by mydriasis, affects artificial intelligence (AI) model performance. This study examines the role of mydriasis in improving image quality and AI-based DR detection in resource-limited settings. MethodsWe compared the proportion of gradable images between mydriatic and non-mydriatic groups and used logistic regression to identify factors influencing image gradability, including age, gender, race, diabetes duration, and systemic hypertension. A ResNet-200d algorithm was trained on the mBRSET dataset and validated on mydriatic and non-mydriatic images. Performance metrics, such as accuracy, F1 score, and AUC, were evaluated. ResultsThe mydriatic group had a higher proportion of gradable images (82.1% vs. 55.6%, P< 0.001). Factors such as systemic hypertension, older age, male gender, and longer diabetes duration were associated with lower image gradability in non-mydriatic images. Mydriatic images achieved better AI performance, with accuracy (82.91% vs. 79.23%), F1 score (0.83 vs. 0.79), and AUC (0.94 vs. 0.93). Among gradable images, the performance difference was not statistically significant. ConclusionMydriasis improves image gradability and enhances AI model performance in DR screening. However, optimizing AI for non-mydriatic imaging is critical for LMICs where mydriatic agents may be unavailable. Refining AI models for consistent performance across imaging conditions is essential to support the broader implementation of AI-driven DR screening in resource-constrained settings.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards implementation of AI in New Zealand national screening program: Cloud-based, Robust, and Bespoke 97%
- Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks 96%
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 95%
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 94%
- Visible light optical coherence tomography of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer reflectivity in glaucoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 96%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 94%
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm 93%
- Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device 93%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.