Back

Isoform-level discovery, quantification and fusion analysis from single-cell and spatial long-read RNA-seq data with Bambu-Clump

Sim, A. D.; Ling, M. H.; Chen, Y.; Lu, H.; See, Y. X.; Perrin, A.; Leng Agnes, O. B.; Cao, E. Y.; Chia, B.; Liu, J.; Wüstefeld, T.; Shin, J.; Göke, J.

2025-01-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.12.30.630828 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single cell and spatial transcriptomics have dramatically changed how we can profile RNA from heterogenous biological samples. Combining single cell and spatial profiling with long read RNA-Seq promises to enable the discovery and quantification of individual RNA isoforms at the single-cell level. However, highly multiplexed data such as from a single cell experiment only generates a limited number of reads for each cell, constituting a major challenge for transcript discovery and quantification with existing approaches that usually have limited power for samples with low sequencing depth. Here we present Bambu-Clump, a computational method that performs transcript discovery and quantification from single cell and spatial long read RNA-Seq data using information from both each cell and the cell cluster. Using this approach, Bambu-Clump provides the most accurate transcript discovery compared to other existing methods, and improves transcript quantification compared to methods that rely on estimates derived from single cells. We apply Bambu-Clump to identify fusion transcripts in single-cells, compare 5 and 3 selection protocols, and identify novel isoform cell-type markers in spatial mouse brain data. Together, Bambu-Clump provides an easy-to-use, efficient, and accurate method for analysing individual isoform expression for single cells and cell clusters across multiple datasets and replicates from long read RNA-Seq.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.