Systematic Prioritisation of AI-Detected Chest X-ray Abnormalities for Optimised Lung Cancer Detection
Bramley, R.; Sharman, A.; Duerden, R.; Lyon, S.; Ryan, M.; Weber, E.; Brown, L.; Evison, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to establish a reproducible method for categorisation of the AI-detected chest X-ray (CXR) abnormalities that should be prioritised for urgent reporting to support faster lung cancer diagnosis. By selecting findings informed by cancer prevalence and clinical significance, we sought to maximise detection while maintaining a high negative predictive value (NPV). Materials and MethodsTwo cohorts of CXRs were evaluated: (1) a retrospective cohort of patients with confirmed lung cancer and abnormal CXRs, and (2) a prospective cohort of primary care referred CXRs from seven Greater Manchester trusts, with the AI system in shadow mode. The AI triage system (Annalise Enterprise CXR) evaluated the relative prevalence of 124 abnormalities, and prioritisation strategies were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV. ResultsA total of 1,282 lung cancer patients were included in cohort 1. In cohort 2, the AI system processed 13,802 CXRs. Sensitivity was 95.87% (94.77%-96.97%) in cohort 1, and specificity was 79.11% (78.43%-79.79%) in cohort 2, with an NPV of 99.95%. ConclusionThis study presents a systematic, reproducible method for prioritising AI-detected CXR abnormalities, balancing high sensitivity and NPV while minimising low-risk prioritisation. This approach provides a data-driven alternative to traditional methods relying solely on clinical judgement.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Early user experience and lessons learned using ultra-portable digital X-ray with computer-aided detection (DXR-CAD) products: A qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers 93%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 92%
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 95%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center 93%
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 92%
- Chest X-Ray Has Poor Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Significance in COVID-19: A Propensity Matched Database Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.