Impact of a geriatric emergency management nurse on thirty-day emergency department revisits: a retrospective propensity score matched case-control study
Germain, N.; Samb, R.; Cote, E.; Toulouse-Fournier, A.; Robitaille, J.; Turcotte, S.; Morin, M.; Audet, M.; Bert, L.; Rivard, J.; Brousseau, A.-A.; Chartier, L. B.; Sourial, N.; Legare, F.; Witteman, H. O.; Dallaire, C.; Kroon, C.; Archambault, P. M.; LEARNING WISDOM Investigators, ; for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers,
Show abstract
ObjectivesGeriatric Emergency Management (GEM) nurses aim to reduce adverse outcomes by addressing unique needs of older adults seen in emergency departments (EDs), but evidence to demonstrate their impact on ED care transitions is mixed. We evaluated the impact of implementing a GEM nurse model in a local ED on thirty-day revisits using propensity score matching to control for relevant patient characteristics. MethodsA case-control design was used to analyze older adult patients who were triaged to a stretcher at an ED in Levis, Quebec, from October 2018 to September 2019. We used propensity score matching to compare patients who received the GEM nurse intervention with control patients who did not receive the intervention. This intervention involved a targeted geriatric ED assessment including history, physical exam, chart review, communication with caregivers and home care services, and the creation of an intervention and care transition plan to support safe discharge from the ED. We followed both the EQUATOR networks brief guidelines for reporting a propensity score analysis and the STROBE guideline. ResultsOut of 21,024 patients visiting the ED over a one-year period, 7,952 were eligible for analysis, with pre-matching differences showing GEM patients were older and more frequent ED users. Propensity score matching resulted in 724 patients with no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Using a Cox regression analysis, we found a non-significant 6% decrease in the risk of ED revisit within 30 days for the GEM group (HR = 0.94, p = .692). ConclusionsThe GEM nursing intervention targeting better care transition plans personalized to the needs of each patient did not significantly impact thirty-day revisits to the ED. Further work is needed to determine the most effective specific components of such interventions to maximize future positive impact on the care transitions of older patients. Clinicians capsuleO_ST_ABSWhat is known about the topic?C_ST_ABSGeriatric emergency management (GEM) nurses heterogeneously contribute to reducing emergency department revisits among older adults but may improve the quality of care. What did this study ask?How would the implementation of a Geriatric Emergency Management (GEM) nurse intervention in a local emergency department (ED) impact 30-day revisits among older adults? What did this study find?Despite not reaching statistical significance, we observed a 6% reduction in revisit rates. Why does this study matter to clinicians?We should refine and support GEM nurse practices, along with shifting outcome measures from service-level metrics to patient-centered metrics like quality of life and symptom burden.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Silver Trauma Review Clinic: A novel model of care to manage non-operative injuries in older patients 93%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 93%
- Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study. 95%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 93%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Life expectancy, quality of life, and hope among Japanese patients receiving home medical care 93%
- Incidence and risk factors for post-stroke delirium in the elderly: a national inpatient sample (NIS) analysis 93%
- Evaluating the predictive value of frailty scores for critical care admission and hospital stay in elderly surgical patients: a comparison of the mFI-5 and CCI 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergency department care transition barriers: a qualitative study of care partners of older adults with cognitive impairment 95%
- Change in cognition and body mass index in relation to preclinical dementia 86%
- Association of the use of hearing aids with the conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia and progression of dementia: a longitudinal retrospective study 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study 97%
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 94%
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Adjusted Mortality Risk in Care Homes for Older Adults in Wales, United Kingdom: A retrospective population-based cohort study for mortality in 2016-2020 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.