Transcriptomic regulation of juvenile-to-adult vegetative phase transition in grapevine
Ferradas, Y.; Royo, C.; Martinez Zapater, J. M.; Lijavetzky, D.
Show abstract
Plants go through two distinct stages in their vegetative phase, with the juvenile stage being characterized by a lack of maturity to respond to flowering induction stimuli and the adult stage marked by the presence of this capacity. Phase transition has been extensively analysed in herbaceous species such as Arabidopsis and maize, where the sequential activity of miR156 and miR172 in the control of the juvenile to adult phase transition has been determined. Contrarily, little is known about most woody perennial crops, where phase transition appears to be dissociated, with a first transition from juvenile to adult vegetative state in the first year and a subsequent induction to flower in later years under flowering-inductive environmental conditions. This significantly extended vegetative phase makes fruit production depend on the grafting of adult vegetative materials. A particular aspect of grapevine vegetative phase transition is that it is marked by the differentiation of tendrils, a modified sterile reproductive organ adapted to climbing, which is continuously generated with different patterns in different Vitis species. When the grapevine plant reaches flowering inductive condition in later years, it produces inflorescences in place of some tendrils. As a first step to understand the regulation of phase change in grapevine, we have performed a detailed gene expression analysis of the juvenile-to-adult phase transition during the development of grapevine plantlets grown from seeds. The RNA-seq analysis demonstrated that miR156 was significantly repressed in the grapevines adult phase, where the appearance of tendrils acts as a marker of the transition. Consistent with the results reported in other species, we observed the activation of several SPL genes, known to be targets of miR156, providing evidence for the conservation of the miR156-SPLs regulatory module in grapevine. However, no variation was detected in the expression of miR172 and TPS genes were found downregulated, two key determinants in the transition to flowering in other species. This could be explained considering that grapevines do not flower during the first years of growth. Interestingly, we were able to observe the overexpression of several genes known to be involved in the establishment of flower meristem identity, which in the case of grape had also been detected along tendril development, consistent with the proposed common ontogenetic origin of tendrils and inflorescences in the Vitaceae family.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular mechanisms underlying the early steps of floral initiation in seasonal flowering genotypes of cultivated strawberry 98%
- Temporal Gene Expression in Apical Culms Shows Early Changes in Cell Wall Biosynthesis Genes in Sugarcane 97%
- The molecular basis of Kale domestication: Transcription profiling of leaves and meristems provides new insights into the evolution of a Brassica oleracea vegetative morphotype 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The SINGLE FLOWER (SFL) gene encodes a MYB transcription factor that regulates the number of flowers produced by the inflorescence of chickpea. 97%
- Identification of a novel link connecting indole-3-acetamide with abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling 96%
- afila, the origin and nature of a major innovation in the history of pea breeding 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptomic landscape of seedstick in Arabidopsis thaliana funiculus after fertilisation 97%
- A systemic approach provides insights into the salt stress adaptation mechanisms of contrasting bread wheat genotypes 95%
- Water deficit response in nodulated soybean roots: a comprehensive transcriptome and translatome network analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.