Back

The Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Protein 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2Is) in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dhoop, S. M.; Shehada, M.; Sawaf, B.; Patel, M.; Roberts, L.; Lee Smith, W.; Hart, B.

2024-12-27 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.12.27.24319638 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSodium-Glucose Cotransporter Protein 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2Is) are known for their cardiovascular and renoprotective benefits and are efficacious in managing Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD). However, limited data exist on their use in advanced liver disease, particularly liver cirrhosis. AimsTo synthesize existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2Is in patients with liver cirrhosis and to provide clinical guidance. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA 2020 Statement. Searches in major health databases identified studies where SGLT2Is were used in patients with cirrhosis. The analysis focused on prospective trials in decompensated cirrhosis and retrospective studies in compensated cirrhosis. Primary outcomes included the need for large-volume paracentesis (LVP) and mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed weight loss, loop diuretic dose reduction, residual ascites, acute kidney injury (AKI), hyponatremia, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and urinary tract infections (UTIs). ResultsTen studies (8 peer-reviewed) from 2020-2024 were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 4 single-arm prospective trials, and 4 retrospective studies. SGLT2I use was associated with reduced LVP (RR 0.45, CI 0.31-0.66, p<0.001) and mortality (aHR 0.46, CI 0.38-0.55, p<0.001). Benefits included a 39 mg reduction in loop diuretic dose, 7 kg weight loss, and no significant increase in residual ascites, AKI, hyponatremia, HE, or UTIs. ConclusionsSGLT2Is show promise in managing diuretic-resistant ascites and reducing mortality in liver cirrhosis without causing significant adverse events. Larger, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
3
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%