Back

The Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Protein 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2Is) in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dhoop, S. M.; Shehada, M.; Sawaf, B.; Patel, M.; Roberts, L.; Lee Smith, W.; Hart, B.

2024-12-27 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.12.27.24319638
Show abstract

BackgroundSodium-Glucose Cotransporter Protein 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2Is) are known for their cardiovascular and renoprotective benefits and are efficacious in managing Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD). However, limited data exist on their use in advanced liver disease, particularly liver cirrhosis. AimsTo synthesize existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2Is in patients with liver cirrhosis and to provide clinical guidance. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA 2020 Statement. Searches in major health databases identified studies where SGLT2Is were used in patients with cirrhosis. The analysis focused on prospective trials in decompensated cirrhosis and retrospective studies in compensated cirrhosis. Primary outcomes included the need for large-volume paracentesis (LVP) and mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed weight loss, loop diuretic dose reduction, residual ascites, acute kidney injury (AKI), hyponatremia, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and urinary tract infections (UTIs). ResultsTen studies (8 peer-reviewed) from 2020-2024 were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 4 single-arm prospective trials, and 4 retrospective studies. SGLT2I use was associated with reduced LVP (RR 0.45, CI 0.31-0.66, p<0.001) and mortality (aHR 0.46, CI 0.38-0.55, p<0.001). Benefits included a 39 mg reduction in loop diuretic dose, 7 kg weight loss, and no significant increase in residual ascites, AKI, hyponatremia, HE, or UTIs. ConclusionsSGLT2Is show promise in managing diuretic-resistant ascites and reducing mortality in liver cirrhosis without causing significant adverse events. Larger, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gastroenterology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
16.2%
2
American Journal of Gastroenterology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
13.3%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 38%
13.2%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 0.7%
4.7%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 4%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.6%
3.1%
7
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
3.0%
8
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 29%
3.0%
9
Gut
based on 17 papers
Top 0.9%
3.0%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 51%
3.0%
11
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 7%
2.4%
12
Journal of Translational Medicine
based on 21 papers
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 12%
1.7%
15
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 10%
1.4%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 17%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 14%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Nutrition
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
21
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Gut Microbes
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Global Health
based on 24 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Internal Medicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Med
based on 26 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Metabolites
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%