TLS_Finder: An algorithm for Identifying Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Using Immune Cell Spatial Coordinates
Koksoy, A. A.; Salvatierra, M. E.; MOSAIC Team, ; Solis Soto, L. M.; Haymaker, C.
Show abstract
Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are lymphoid formations that develop in non-lymphoid tissues during chronic inflammation, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. Accurate identification and quantification of TLS in tissue can provide crucial insights into the immune response of several disease processes including antitumor immune response. TLS are defined as aggregates of T cells, B cells and dendritic cells. In histological tissue sections stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin they are identified as aggregates of 50 or more lymphoid cells, however immunohistochemical analysis are required to confirm presence of distinct immune cell patterns. Assessment of lymphoid aggregates can be done in H&E slides or in slides stained with single or multiplex immunohistochemistry or other tissue based high-plex approaches with key biomarkers such as CD3 (T cells) and CD20 (B cells), however manual assessment of them is time consuming thus limiting its full evaluation. To our knowledge, published algorithms that identify TLS within a tissue are based on histological assessment of H&E slides or through use of ML algorithms trained on images that show the TLS presence in tissues; and quantification and spatial analysis of TLS still remains a challenge. This study aims to develop a robust algorithm to recognize TLS using the spatial coordinates of immune cells in any given tissue. The algorithm uses X and Y coordinates of T and B cells in tissues identified by a pathologist-supervised digital image analysis of multiplex chromogenic immunohistochemistry of tissues stained with CD3 and CD20. The algorithm is flexible to be used for detailed analysis of TLS stages; including other cell types within the definition of TLS; such as dendritic cells (DC) and high endothelial venules (HEV); to assess different stages of TLS formation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 93%
- Molecular signatures for inflammation vary across cancer types and correlate significantly with tumor stage, gender and vital status of patients 93%
- Pixelwise H-score: a novel digital image analysis based-metric to quantify membrane biomarker expression from immunohistochemistry images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A 30-Color Full-Spectrum Flow Cytometry Panel to Characterize the Immune Cell Landscape in Spleen and Tumors within a Syngeneic MC-38 Murine Colon Carcinoma Model 94%
- Hematologist-level classification of mature B-cell neoplasm using deep learning on multiparameter flow cytometry data 93%
- Classification of human white blood cells using machine learning for stain-free imaging flow cytometry 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.