Exploring Patient Preference Information in Clinical Research and Decision Models: An Investigative Survey
Di Blasio, M.; Bami, Z.; Fava, C.; Visconti, A.; Baldi, I.; Berchialla, P.
Show abstract
Patient preferences are playing an increasingly pivotal role in defining care pathways, assessing care quality, and advancing healthcare technologies, but their current use remains unclear. We conducted an online survey collecting data from 46 experts in clinical research, pharmaceutical industry, regulatory affairs, and health technology assessment. About 30% of our respondents are using PPI routinely, and 90% are willing to prioritize their integration in the future, despite various challenges, such as limited patient engagement, difficulty in obtaining reliable data, and reluctance to deviating from traditional practices. We show here a growing recognition of the potential benefits of integrating PPI, and that concerted efforts and investments are necessary to support a wider adoption.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 91%
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 91%
- Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) as Novel Sources for Population-Based Post Marketing Surveillance of Medical Products: A Pilot Study from the FDA Sentinel Innovation Center 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 94%
- Acute Pain Pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study 91%
- Financial Conflicts of Interest among U.S. Physician Authors of 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 93%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 92%
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- INSIGHT: A Tool for Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety 93%
- A Systematic Process for Assessing Fitness-for-Purpose of Health Outcomes for Computable Phenotyping with Electronic Health Record Data 91%
- Using Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes to Supplement Structured Electronic Health Record Data for Phenotyping Smoking and Obesity in a Healthcare System 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.