Back

Primary healthcare providers perspectives on six-month dispensing of HIV medication in South Africa: a cross-sectional survey

Ntjikelane, V.; Huber, A.; Morgan, A.; Pascoe, S.; Manganye, M.; Malala, L.; Rosen, S.

2024-12-29 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.12.24.24319374 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn many African countries the dispensing duration for antiretroviral therapy (ART) medication for HIV treatment has increased from 3 months to 6 months for stable clients. To help inform a decision about whether to move from three-month dispensing (3MMD) to six-month dispensing (6MMD) in South Africa, we surveyed healthcare providers about their perspectives on dispensing and scripting durations. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers (nurses, managers, pharmacists) at 24 primary healthcare clinics in South Africa from May to September 2024, asking closed- and open-ended questions. Results are reported as frequencies. Results182 providers were enrolled from four provinces (median age 44, 88% female). Most (>70%) respondents said that the 3MMD guideline offered multiple benefits for providers and patients, compared to the previous two-month dispensing rule; most (64%) also said there were no challenges in implementing 3MMD. >80% of respondents across all cadres reported that they would be comfortable dispensing 6 months of ART at a time, believing that it would reduce facility overcrowding, lighten staff workloads, and be advantageous to clients by decreasing their visit burden and travel costs. Two thirds (63%) of participating nurses, who provide the largest share of direct ART care, were also in favour of resuming 12-month scripting for ART; the remaining 37% expressed concerns about decreases in treatment adherence and clinical monitoring of clients. ConclusionMost healthcare providers at primary healthcare clinics in South Africa are in favour of allowing six-month dispensing and 12-month prescriptions as options for established ART clients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.4%
2
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
6
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%