Back

Primary healthcare providers perspectives on six-month dispensing of HIV medication in South Africa: a cross-sectional survey

Ntjikelane, V.; Huber, A.; Morgan, A.; Pascoe, S.; Manganye, M.; Malala, L.; Rosen, S.

2024-12-29 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.12.24.24319374 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn many African countries the dispensing duration for antiretroviral therapy (ART) medication for HIV treatment has increased from 3 months to 6 months for stable clients. To help inform a decision about whether to move from three-month dispensing (3MMD) to six-month dispensing (6MMD) in South Africa, we surveyed healthcare providers about their perspectives on dispensing and scripting durations. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers (nurses, managers, pharmacists) at 24 primary healthcare clinics in South Africa from May to September 2024, asking closed- and open-ended questions. Results are reported as frequencies. Results182 providers were enrolled from four provinces (median age 44, 88% female). Most (>70%) respondents said that the 3MMD guideline offered multiple benefits for providers and patients, compared to the previous two-month dispensing rule; most (64%) also said there were no challenges in implementing 3MMD. >80% of respondents across all cadres reported that they would be comfortable dispensing 6 months of ART at a time, believing that it would reduce facility overcrowding, lighten staff workloads, and be advantageous to clients by decreasing their visit burden and travel costs. Two thirds (63%) of participating nurses, who provide the largest share of direct ART care, were also in favour of resuming 12-month scripting for ART; the remaining 37% expressed concerns about decreases in treatment adherence and clinical monitoring of clients. ConclusionMost healthcare providers at primary healthcare clinics in South Africa are in favour of allowing six-month dispensing and 12-month prescriptions as options for established ART clients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.