Tracking Progress: Trends in Surgical Indicator Reporting in the World Development Indicators
Torres Perez-Iglesias, C.; Jensen, K.; Raguveer, V.; Hyman, G. Y.; Suzuki, E.; Meara, J. G.; Raykar, N. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) emphasized the need for six core indicators to track progress toward safe, affordable, and timely surgical care. In 2016, four of these indicators were integrated into the World Development Indicators (WDI) to facilitate global tracking of surgical system performance. However, the impact of these indicators relies on the accuracy and frequency of the reported data. We aimed to analyze trends in the reporting of the WDI surgical indicators and evaluate trends in the context of countries undertaking National Surgical Plans (NSPs). MethodsData were extracted from the World Bank WDI database and analyzed by WHO region from 2015-2020. Countries were categorized based on their engagement with NSPs. Trends in reporting for the four surgical indicators--surgical case volume (SV), surgical workforce density (SW), catastrophic health expenditure (CHE), and impoverishing expenditure (IE)--were assessed. Correlations between NSP implementation and reporting completeness were explored. ResultsFrom 2015 to 2020, reporting rates for the modeled indicators CHE and IE remained stable, with an average annual reporting rate of 62% for both. In contrast, the reporting of non-modeled indicators (SV, SW) declined over the study period. SV reporting dropped from 12% in 2015 to 0% in 2020, and SW reporting decreased from 18% to 0%. Regional disparities were significant: the European region had the highest reporting rates for non-modeled indicators, with 13.3% for SW and 3.7% for SV, while the African region reported only 5.4% for SW and 1.8% for SV. No significant correlation was found between NSP implementation and reporting rates (R{superscript 2} = 0.00014, p = 0.986). ConclusionsDespite integrating surgical indicators into the WDI, reporting rates remain low, particularly for non-modeled indicators. Strengthening data collection and reporting systems, particularly in low-resource settings, is essential for improving surgical care monitoring and addressing global disparities.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 93%
- Trends, wealth inequalities and the role of the private sector in caesarean section in the Middle East and North Africa: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of population-based surveys 92%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 94%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 92%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Drivers of COVID-19 policy stringency in 175 countries and territories: COVID-19 cases and deaths, gross domestic products per capita, and health expenditures 90%
- Inequities in Effective Coverage of Family Planning Services in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Linking Households and Facility Surveys 89%
- Availability and readiness of healthcare facilities and their effects on under-five mortality in Bangladesh: Analysis of linked data 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.