Back

Heterologous Expression of the carbon monoxide dehydrogenase Gene from Clostridium sp. to Enhance Acetic Acid and Alcohol Production from CO2

Tharak, A.; G, S.; Kaveti, S.; Jain, N.; Mohan, S. V.

2024-12-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.12.21.629878 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study evaluates the performance of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (codh) embedded strains in bench-scale microbial electrochemical systems (MES) for CO2 reduction to biofuels and biochemicals. CO2 fermentation efficiency was evaluated by comparing the wild-type Clostridium acetobutylicum (Wild), a negative control E. coli strain lacking the codh gene (NC-BL21), and engineered E. coli strain (Eng) alone and with IPTG induction (Eng+IPTG). Four electrochemical systems were used viz. Wild+E, NC-BL21+E, Eng+E, and Eng+IPTG+E, with a poised potential of 0.6 V applied to the working electrode. CO2 and bicarbonate were supplemented to a total inorganic carbon (IC) concentration of 40 g/L, with a retention time of 60 h. The engineered strains demonstrated enhanced metabolic performance compared to the wild-type and negative control strains, yielding a maximum formic acid concentration of 2.1 g/L and acetic acid concentration of 7.8 g/L under the Eng+IPTG condition. Ethanol yield was highest at 3.9 g/L under the Eng+IPTG+E condition, substantially exceeding the 2.4 g/L acetic acid yield observed in the wild-type strain. The engineered strains showed superior cumulative yields (0.4075 g/g), improved codh charge flux stability (60 vs. 5 for Wild), and upregulated expression of genes in the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway. Bioelectrochemical performance analysis demonstrated elevated reductive catalytic currents, enhanced CO2 reduction, and optimal charge transfer kinetics. This study highlights the effectiveness of genetic and process engineering, particularly codh overexpression and IPTG induction, in optimizing microbial electrosynthesis for biofuel and biochemical production from C1 gases.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
12
Biotechnology for Biofuels
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
21
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%