Back

Breaking Barriers in Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry: Enhanced Throughput and Sensitivity with the Orbitrap Astral Mass Analyzer

Mueller, F.; Stejskal, K.; Mechtler, K.

2025-02-26 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.12.21.629875 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The advancement of crosslinking mass spectrometry (CLMS) has significantly enhanced the ability to study protein-protein interactions and complex biological systems. This study evaluates the performance of the Orbitrap Astral and Eclipse mass spectrometers in CLMS workflows, focusing on the identification of low-abundance crosslinked peptides. The comparison employed consistent liquid chromatography setups and experimental conditions, using Cas9 crosslinked with PhoX and DSSO as quality control samples. Results demonstrated that the Astral analyzer outperformed the Eclipse, achieving over 40% more unique residue pairs (URP) due to its superior sensitivity and dynamic range, attributed to its multi-reflection time-of-flight analyzer and nearly lossless ion transmission. Additionally, the study revealed that single higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation methods significantly outperformed stepped HCD methods on the Astral, while the Eclipse maintained similar performance across both approaches. Gradient optimization experiments further highlighted the impact of separation times on crosslink identifications, with longer gradients yielding higher identification rates. Collectively, this work underscores the importance of instrumentation choice, fragmentation strategies, and method optimization in maximizing CLMS performance for protein interaction studies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.3%
2
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
3
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
5
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
7
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
14
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
17
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
20
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
21
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%