Expanding the capillarics toolbox: 3D-printed microfluidic phaseguides and self-coalescence modules
Craig, C.; Leong, K. M.; Lin, C. H.; Chang, M.; Olanrewaju, A.
Show abstract
Capillarics are microfluidic circuits that are assembled from individual fluidic elements, powered by surface tension forces encoded by microchannel geometry and surface chemistry, and enable instrument-free pre-programmed automation of multi-step liquid handling processes. 3D printing has recently transformed capillarics by enabling rapid and cost-effective prototyping, provided addition geometric degrees of freedom in multi-level fabrication, and facilitated new design paradigms with greater capabilities than traditional cleanroom fabrication. Despite widespread interest in 3D printing and development of custom high-resolution stereolithography printers for microfluidic applications, fluidic elements that require precise and tunable control over capillary pinning lines -- such as fluidic phaseguides and self-coalescence modules (SCMs) -- have so far only been manufactured with centralized and expensive cleanroom methods. Not only does this limit access to versatile capillaric features to only well-resourced settings, but it also slows innovation and widespread application of these fluid handling technologies. Here we expand the toolbox of 3D-printed capillarics to include phaseguides and SCMs, demonstrating their potential for precise instrument-free control over multi-step liquid handling and reagent rehydration. We employed benchtop stereolithography printers to prototype (up to 50X) scaled-up phaseguides and SCMs and integrated them into a capillaric circuit for inline reagent reconstitution, dynamic fluid control, and sequential drainage. We showcased scalable designs, customizable geometries, and robust self-coalescing flow for larger liquid volumes -- up to 50 L compared with 1.25 L in cleanroom-fabricated SCMs. This work represents a significant advance in democratizing access to microfluidics, with potential for broad applications in diagnostics, assay automation, and organ-on-chip systems.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatiotemporal control of a multilayered co-axial flow in a 3D printed microchannel with cascaded nozzles 97%
- Evaluating Flow-Focused Microfluidic Device Fabrication Techniques for Silk Fibroin Microgel Production 94%
- A Versatile Photocrosslinkable Silicone Composite for 3D Printing Applications 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High throughput intracellular delivery by viscoelastic mechanoporation 95%
- Microrobots Powered by Concentration Polarization Electrophoresis (CPEP) 93%
- Building programmable multicompartment artificial cells incorporating remotely activated protein channels using microfluidics and acoustic levitation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive droplet microfluidic platform for high-throughput screening of microbial proteolytic activity. 96%
- Exceeding 80% efficiency of single-bead encapsulation in microdroplets through hydrogel coating-assisted close-packed ordering 95%
- High throughput steady-state enzyme kinetics measured in a parallel droplet generation and absorbance detection platform 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simplified, Shear Induced Generation of Double Emulsions for Robust Compartmentalization during Single Genome Analysis 96%
- Superhydrophobic Rotation-Chip for Computer-Vision Identification of Drug-Resistant Bacteria 95%
- Designing Biological Micro-Sensors with Chiral Nematic Liquid Crystal Droplets 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.