Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression
KHALIL, A.; Azhar, Z. I.; Shuib, N.; Baker, P.; Chen, X. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundDepression is a leading global cause of disability, significantly affecting individuals quality of life and contributing to a substantial worldwide health burden. Self-help practices have emerged as cost-effective and scalable strategies for managing mild to moderate depression, empowering individuals to take an active role in their mental health care. Theory-based interventions, which are grounded in established psychological frameworks, provide a systematic approach to designing, implementing and evaluating these self-help practices. However, despite the growing availability of self-help interventions, their effectiveness varies, and many lack a solid theoretical foundation. Summarized evidence of the effects of theory-based interventions remains limited. ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of theory-based interventions incorporating self-help practices in reducing depressive symptoms severity among adults with mild to moderate depression. MethodsThe review will follow PRISMA guidelines and has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Randomised trials evaluating theory-based interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs), delivered via digital platforms will be included. Studies will be identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct and Cochrane bibliographic databases. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers, focusing on study characteristics, intervention details and critical outcomes (reduction in depressive symptom severity and adverse effects). ResultsThe review will synthesize evidence on the effects and adaptability of theory-based interventions, highlighting the specific contributions of theoretical frameworks to intervention outcomes. Findings will be presented in tabular and narrative formats, identifying gaps and implications for clinical practice and future research. ConclusionThis systematic review will provide actionable insights into the design and implementation of theory-based interventions for managing mild to moderate depression. The findings aim to inform evidence-based guidelines for primary care integration, promoting accessible, scalable and effective mental health solutions globally.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 95%
- Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists’ competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcome in psychotherapy for depression. Study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial 95%
- Mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 94%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of guided self-help Behavioral Activation intervention for geriatric depression 94%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 93%
- Transdiagnostic phenotyping of psychopathology in a help-seeking population (PhenoNetz) - a study protocol for an experience sampling study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.