Back

Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression

KHALIL, A.; Azhar, Z. I.; Shuib, N.; Baker, P.; Chen, X. W.

2024-12-24 public and global health
10.1101/2024.12.20.24319466 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDepression is a leading global cause of disability, significantly affecting individuals quality of life and contributing to a substantial worldwide health burden. Self-help practices have emerged as cost-effective and scalable strategies for managing mild to moderate depression, empowering individuals to take an active role in their mental health care. Theory-based interventions, which are grounded in established psychological frameworks, provide a systematic approach to designing, implementing and evaluating these self-help practices. However, despite the growing availability of self-help interventions, their effectiveness varies, and many lack a solid theoretical foundation. Summarized evidence of the effects of theory-based interventions remains limited. ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of theory-based interventions incorporating self-help practices in reducing depressive symptoms severity among adults with mild to moderate depression. MethodsThe review will follow PRISMA guidelines and has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Randomised trials evaluating theory-based interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs), delivered via digital platforms will be included. Studies will be identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct and Cochrane bibliographic databases. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers, focusing on study characteristics, intervention details and critical outcomes (reduction in depressive symptom severity and adverse effects). ResultsThe review will synthesize evidence on the effects and adaptability of theory-based interventions, highlighting the specific contributions of theoretical frameworks to intervention outcomes. Findings will be presented in tabular and narrative formats, identifying gaps and implications for clinical practice and future research. ConclusionThis systematic review will provide actionable insights into the design and implementation of theory-based interventions for managing mild to moderate depression. The findings aim to inform evidence-based guidelines for primary care integration, promoting accessible, scalable and effective mental health solutions globally.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.6%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%