Back

Frailty in older patients with atrial fibrillation and its relationship with anticoagulant use: a multi-centred observational study in New South Wales

Nguyen, T. N.; Fujita, K.; Hilmer, S. N.

2024-12-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.12.20.24319406
Show abstract

Background and aimsEvidence of the impact of frailty on oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription in older people with atrial fibrillation (AF) is conflicting. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of frailty in hospitalised older patients with AF and its relationship with OAC prescription during admission. The secondary aim was to examine the association between frailty and rate/rhythm control medication prescriptions. MethodsThis retrospective observational study included adults aged [&ge;]65 with AF admitted to six hospitals in Australia in 2022. Frailty was defined by a Frailty Index [&ge;]0.25. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the association between frailty and the prescriptions of OAC, rate-control and rhythm-control drugs during hospitalisation. Results are presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsThere were 685 patients, with a mean age of 82.6(SD 8.3), 49.8% female and 42.8% identified as frail. Overall, 75.6% were prescribed OAC (67.9% in the frail versus 81.4% in the non-frail, p<0.001), 37.7% received rate-control drugs (42.0% in the frail versus 34.4% in the non-frail, p=0.044), 27.3% received rhythm-control drugs (22.9% in the frail versus 30.6% in the non-frail, p=0.024). The adjusted odds ratios of frailty on prescriptions were 0.58 (95% CI 0.39-0.86) for OAC, 1.75 (95%CI 1.22-2.52) for rate-control drugs, and 0.83 (95%CI 0.55-1.24) for rhythm-control drugs. ConclusionsThe study revealed a high prevalence of frailty in older inpatients with AF. Frailty was associated with reduced likelihood of prescription of OAC during admission and increased likelihood of prescribing rate-control medications, with no independent impact on rhythm-control therapy. Further studies are needed to understand these prescribing patterns.

Matching journals

1
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
#1
114× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 9%
3.2× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 42%
12.0%
4
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
95× avg
5
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
48× avg
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 5%
6.3× avg
7
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
8
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 3%
9.9× avg
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
10
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.4%
44× avg
11
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 3%
15× avg
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
5.3× avg
13
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
14
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
15
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
20× avg
16
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
17
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 82%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 23%
0.7%
19
British Journal of General Practice
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
6.6× avg