Back

Chlorhexidine Bathing for Candida auris Decolonization among Adult Patients in Healthcare Settings: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Belfakir, M.; Sherif, M.; Adam, B.

2024-12-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.12.20.24319367 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCandida auris (C. auris) poses a significant threat in healthcare settings, characterized by its high morbidity and mortality rates. While the use of chlorhexidine bathing has been suggested as a potential strategy for C. auris decolonization in adult patients within healthcare settings, a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of its effectiveness and associated outcomes is notably lacking. AimThis study seeks to systematically assess the effectiveness of daily chlorhexidine bathing for Candida auris decolonization in adult patients within healthcare settings. The studys primary objectives are to evaluate the impact of this intervention on reducing colonization rates, infection occurrences, and outbreak incidences, while concurrently evaluating any associated adverse events. The studys secondary objectives are to identify adverse events, and to explore and quantify the effect sizes of potential risk factors, if identified, that may influence the outcomes of chlorhexidine bathing for C. auris decolonization. Methods and AnalysisIn adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines, this protocol outlines the methodology for our systematic review and meta-analysis. The study commenced with an extensive presearch conducted from June to August 2023 on PubMed, followed by searches across other three key databases: Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, in September 2023. The systematic search will encompass all available years of publication without applying any publication date filters. Records located in the literature search will be uploaded to the systematic review software Covidence to facilitate deduplication, blinded screening, and the selection of eligible studies. Two independent reviewers will rigorously screen records, extract data, and perform risk of bias assessments, with a third researcher resolving conflicts. The results will be synthesized narratively in summary tables, with the potential for meta-analysis contingent upon the findings, focusing on the effectiveness and adverse events of daily chlorhexidine bathing for C. auris decolonization in adult patients within healthcare settings. Additionally, we will investigate whether certain risk factors, if identified, have an impact on the outcomes by quantifying their effect sizes. Ethics and DisseminationThe ethical framework of this systematic review obviates the need for ethics approval, as it relies exclusively on published research. The outcomes of this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal, shared with stakeholders, and made publicly accessible. PROSPERO RegistrationCRD42023459048.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
4
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
6
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
7
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%