Back

Toward Digital Twins in the Intensive Care Unit: A Medication Management Case Study

Eslami, B.; Afshar, M.; Tootooni, M. S.; Miller, T.; Churpek, M. M.; Gao, Y.; Dligach, D.

2024-12-28 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.12.20.24319170 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of digital twins developed using a large language model (LLaMA-3), fine-tuned with Low-Rank Adapters (LoRA) on ICU physician notes, and to determine whether specialty-specific training enhances treatment recommendation accuracy compared to other ICU specialties or zero-shot baselines. Materials and MethodsDigital twins were created using LLaMA-3 fine-tuned on discharge summaries from the MIMIC-III dataset, where medications were masked to construct training and testing datasets. The medical ICU dataset (1,000 notes) was used for evaluation, and performance was assessed using BERTScore and ROUGE-L. A zero-shot baseline model, relying solely on contextual instructions without training, was also evaluated. While our approach moves toward digital twin capabilities, it does not incorporate real-time, patient-specific EHR data and can be viewed as an ICU specialty-level language model adaptation. ResultsModels fine-tuned on medical ICU notes achieved the highest BERTScore (0.842), outperforming models trained on other specialties or mixed datasets. Zero-shot models showed the lowest performance, highlighting the importance of training. DiscussionThe findings demonstrate that specialty-specific training significantly improves treatment recommendation accuracy in digital twins compared to generalized or zero-shot approaches. Tailoring models to specific ICU domains strengthens their clinical decision-support capabilities. ConclusionContext-specific fine-tuning of large language models is crucial for developing effective digital twins, offering foundational insights for personalized clinical decision support.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.