Back

Suaeda Salsa Hyperspectral Index (SSHI) for mapping S. salsa in coastal wetlands using hyperspectral satellite imagery

zhang, m.; Ke, Y.; Shang, K.; Zhuo, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, P.; Zhao, N.; Sha, J.; Li, J.

2024-12-22 ecology
10.1101/2024.12.19.629534 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Suaeda Salsa (S. salsa), a pioneer species with short and red-purplish plants in the intertidal zones, has significant ecological, economic, recreational and tourism values. Timely monitoring of S. salsa is crucial for understanding its dynamics and sustainable management of coastal wetlands. Hyperspectral satellite offers valuable opportunities due to its detailed spectral information. This study proposed a Suaeda Salsa Hyperspectral Index (SSHI) for S. salsa mapping based on hyperspectral satellite imagery. The SSHI was developed by considering the large within-class spectral variations of cover types at coastal wetlands, accounting for the spectral correlations in hyperspectral data, and employing dynamic band selection on a per-pixel basis to optimize the separation of S. salsa from other land covers. [Formula] (1+ L), where i[isin][499nm, 611nm], j[isin][628nm, 851nm], L= 0.5. We applied SSHI on ZY1-02D/E AHSI images over Yellow River Delta (YRD) and Liao River Delta (LRD), China during 2021 to 2023. Based on SSHI, a simple thresholding method and a random forest (RF) model were used to map S. salsa. Our results showed that the overall accuracies of S. salsa maps achieved 87.96%[~]89.43% (YRD) and 92.03%[~]93.36% (LRD) using thresholds, and 92.62%[~]94.05% (YRD) and 94.74%[~]94.79% (LRD) using RF. For RF, incorporating SSHI improves S. salsa producers accuracies (users accuracies) by 1.02%[~]6.85% (2.26%[~]6.25%) compared to those without SSHI, proving the effectiveness of SSHI. The S. salsa maps reveal notable temporal variations, reflecting the impacts of climate change and human activities. SSHI is also applicable to other hyperspectral imagery, such as GF-5B and PRISMA.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.