Back

Supplementing floral resources does not mitigate the negative effects of urbanisation on cavity-nesting bees and wasps.

Ellis, E. E.; Campbell, S. A.; Edmondson, J. L.

2024-12-22 ecology
10.1101/2024.12.19.629413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LICavity-nesting bees and wasps provide essential ecosystem services such as pollination and pest control. Within urban environments, it is likely that cavity-nesting insects are using greenspaces to forage for food and nesting resources, and thus may benefit from urban greenspace management interventions, such as the addition of flower patches and "bee hotels" (trap nests). C_LIO_LIIn contrast to the relatively large body of work demonstrating the effects of wildflower provisioning on bees in an agricultural context, there have been few studies testing the benefits of floral provisioning, or the relative importance of nest site and food constraints on urban cavity-nesting bees and wasps. Consequently, we lack an empirical evidence base for optimising and informing conservation interventions for these taxa. C_LIO_LITo understand how the addition of floral resources influences cavity-nesting insect communities, we conducted a 2-year study in urban greenspaces used for horticulture (allotments). We manipulated floral and nesting resources by adding nectar-rich flower patches and artificial trap nests, and compared nest colonisation by cavity-nesting bees and wasps in sites with floral additions and where no additions were made. Our sites were configured along an urbanisation gradient, allowing us to examine how surrounding urbanisation influenced these patterns. C_LIO_LIContrary to our predictions, we found no significant difference in trap nest uptake in sites where floral resources were added, compared to control sites. However, cavity-nesting insect abundance showed a 6-fold decrease over our urbanisation gradient. The addition of floral resources did not mitigate the negative effects of urbanisation on cavity-nesting insects. C_LI Synthesis and Applications: Although enhancing floral resources in urban systems is a recognised strategy for conserving key pollinators such as social bees, our findings suggest that this approach alone does not address the challenges faced by cavity-nesting bees or wasps in urban landscapes. Our results suggest that accounting for the diversity of resource requirements and incorporating landscape-scale analysis is essential to ensure local conservation interventions will benefit a diversity of insect communities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
4
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
5
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
6
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
14
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
16
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%