Back

Theory of Mind Variability in Schizophrenia: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective through Neurological Soft Signs and Premorbid Adjustment

Giralt-Lopez, M.; Miret, S.; Campanera, S.; Moreira, M.; Sotero-Moreno, A.; Hostalet, N.; Lazaro, L.; Krebs, M. O.; Fananas, L.; Fatjo-Vilas, M.

2024-12-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.12.18.24319277 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTheory of Mind (ToM) is impaired in individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). Given the neurodevelopmental nature of both social cognition and SZ, variations in ToM abilities likely originate early in life. Thus, indirect markers of altered neurodevelopment, such as neurological soft signs (NSS) and premorbid adjustment (PA), may help explain these differences. MethodsThe study included 38 patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD), 26 healthy siblings and 47 controls. ToM was assessed using the Hinting Task (HT). NSS were evaluated with the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) and PA with the Premorbid Adjustment Scale (PAS), yielding Social and Academic scores. Intelligence Quotient (IQ) was estimated two subtests of the WAIS-III and Family History (FH) through the Family Interview for Genetic Studies (FIGS). ResultsFirst, patients presented more deficits in two subscales of the NES (motor coordination and sequencing of complex motor acts) than siblings and controls, with siblings performing intermediate in the sequencing subscale (linear mixed models, adjusted for age, sex and IQ). Patients showed worse social PA than siblings during childhood and late adolescence. Second, patients showed poorer HT performance than siblings and controls, but the neurodevelopmental markers did not modulate such differences. Third, within each group, neurodevelopmental vulnerability markers were not associated with ToM performance (linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, IQ and FH). ConclusionIn our sample, while patients showed more evidence of neurodevelopmental deviances than siblings and controls, such differences did not contribute to ToM variability, suggesting that they may stem from different neurodevelopment-related pathways.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.