Back

Validation of the Baseline Recurrence Risk in Cellulitis (BRRISC) score and the added impact of acute clinical response

Cross, E. L.; Hayward, G. N.; Llewelyn, M. J.; Walker, A. S.

2024-12-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.12.18.24319216 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe BRRISC score predicts hospital-attended recurrence of cellulitis using baseline clinical data. In practice, clinicians assess treatment response when deciding antibiotic duration. We investigated whether markers of acute clinical response improved prognostic score performance within an external validation cohort. MethodsWe recruited adults with lower limb cellulitis attending hospital. Outcomes included hospital-attended recurrence (primary outcome for validation) and any recurrence. We assessed clinical response from days 0-3 of treatment. Using multivariate logistic regression with backwards elimination, we identified response variables independently associated with either outcome for an extended score. ResultsOf 202 patients, 8% (n=17) experienced hospital-attended recurrence and 23% (n=46) any recurrence. In this validation dataset, the BRRISC score had a C-index=0.75 (95%CI, 0.64-0.86) for predicting hospital-attended recurrence. There was weak evidence that an extended score, incorporating day-2/3 severity of skin blistering, improved the C-index to 0.83 (0.75-0.92). No acute clinical response variables were independently associated with any recurrence after adjusting for BRRISC score. ConclusionOur measures of early clinical response did not add useful prognostic information to BRRISC score baseline risk. Further research should consider whether responses after day-3 add helpful information, whether risk stratification can personalise antibiotic duration, and explore non-antibiotic approaches to prevent recurrence.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.