Assessing the impact of variation in diagnostic coding among the three countries in the UK Biobank
Clifton, L.; Yu, W.; Collister, J. A.; Littlejohns, T. J.; Goldacre, R. R.; Allen, N.; Hunter, D. J.
Show abstract
1.BackgroundThe UK Biobank (UKB) study has linked hospital inpatient data collected from England, Scotland, and Wales, which use different clinical coding systems to record health outcomes. Scotland records up to 6 different diagnostic codes for one inpatient episode, compared with up to 20 in England, and 14 in Wales. We assessed the impact of the variations in diagnostic coding among countries on observed disease incidence rates. MethodsWe examined the number of diagnoses coded by each country, and then compared the incidence of three diseases between countries: Parkinsons disease (PD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and dementia. We constructed Cox models for each disease, adjusting for "country". ResultsEngland appears to have the highest risk (hazard ratio, HR) for all three diseases, while Scotland appears to have the lowest risk: HR [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.54, 0.72] for PD, 0.49 [0.45, 0.54] for T2D, and 0.88 [0.78, 0.99] for dementia. ConclusionsThe observed incidence of these diseases and the estimated effect of "country" in Cox models are likely influenced by the clinical coding variations among countries. Researchers need to be aware of this and account for these variations in their analyses. 2. Key messages in a boxWhat is already known on this topic: O_LIThere are variations in the clinical coding systems in hospitals among the three countries in UKB. C_LIO_LIThese variations could impact research investigating geographic differences in disease incidence. What this study adds: C_LIO_LIWe assessed the impact of the variations in diagnostic coding among the three countries in UKB. C_LIO_LIWe showed that the observed disease incidence and the estimated effect of "country" are likely influenced by these variations. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policy: O_LIResearchers need to understand the provenance of data and account for the different diagnostic coding and other geographic variation specific to each of three countries, in order to reach robust conclusions that are not influenced by artefacts. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Australian Parkinson’s Genetics Study (APGS) - pilot (N = 1,532) 93%
- Replicating a COVID-19 study in a national England database to assess the generalisability of research with regional electronic health record data 92%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical features and outcomes of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and Parkinsonian disorders: a multicentre UK-based study 92%
- Patterns of rates of mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 91%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of comorbidities and socioeconomic deprivation among people who died from dementia in England Between 2013-2023: analysis of death certificates 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Care-Home Mortality and Life Expectancy in Scotland 91%
- COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between cancer and dementia risk in the UK Biobank: evidence of diagnostic bias 93%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 89%
- Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 mortality: prospective cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 94%
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 92%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.