Back

A precision oncology-focused deep learning framework for personalized selection of cancer therapy

Sederman, C.; Yang, C.-H.; Cortes-Sanchez, E.; Di Sera, T.; Huang, X.; Scherer, S. D.; Zhao, L.; Chu, Z.; White, E. R.; Atkinson, A.; Wagstaff, J.; Varley, K. E.; Lewis, M. T.; Qiao, Y.; Welm, B. E.; Welm, A. L.; Marth, G. T.

2024-12-16 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.12.12.628190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Precision oncology matches tumors to targeted therapies based on the presence of actionable molecular alterations. However, most tumors lack actionable alterations, restricting treatment options to cytotoxic chemotherapies for which few data-driven prioritization strategies currently exist. Here, we report an integrated computational/experimental treatment selection approach applicable for both chemotherapies and targeted agents irrespective of actionable alterations. We generated functional drug response data on a large collection of patient-derived tumor models and used it to train ScreenDL, a novel deep learning-based cancer drug response prediction model. ScreenDL leverages the combination of tumor omic and functional drug screening data to predict the most efficacious treatments. We show that ScreenDL accurately predicts response to drugs with diverse mechanisms, outperforming existing methods and approved biomarkers. In our preclinical study, this approach achieved superior clinical benefit and objective response rates in breast cancer patient-derived xenografts, suggesting that testing ScreenDL in clinical trials may be warranted.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.0%
3
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
6
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
13
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
14
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
19
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.4%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
23
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
27
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%