Exploring the help-seeking journeys for Long Covid from a health inequalities perspective: a qualitative study in England
Clutterbuck, D.; Ramasawmy, M.; Pantelic, M.; Allsopp, G.; Gabbay, M.; Hayer, J.; Heightman, M.; Mu, Y.; Sunkersing, D.; Wootton, D.; Banerjee, A.; Alwan, N. A.; the STIMULATE-ICP Consortium,
Show abstract
Background and aimLong Covid is a health condition that continues to be challenging in terms of obtaining care and support, even in the fourth year following its emergence. This study, which forms part of the STIMULATE-ICP study in England, explores the barriers and facilitators people with Long Covid face when trying to access care, as well as experiences in relation to stigma, discrimination, and inequitable treatment. MethodsThe study was co-designed with people with lived experience of Long Covid. People attending three post-covid services in England were invited to participate by clinic staff. Twenty-three participants were interviewed about their experiences in relation to barriers and facilitators of accessing adequate care, including experiences of being treated unfairly. Interviews were analysed thematically. FindingsParticipants experienced difficulties in accessing and receiving appropriate support from primary and secondary care but generally care and support improved once participants were under the care of a Long Covid service. Positive interactions with clinicians who were knowledgeable and supportive helped to foster good patient experiences when accessing Long Covid care. Inequalities in accessing care were reported in the form of experiences of gender and race discrimination. People with previous and existing conditions reported further stigmatisation. Financial barriers to care existed and there were also difficulties faced by those who got infected with COVID-19 early in the pandemic. The impact of Long Covid on mental health was evident, as was the stigma related to mental health and the inadequacy of mental health service provision for people with Long Covid. Some participants who worked within the National Health Service (NHS) perceived their professional position as a facilitator to accessing Long Covid care. However, some NHS employees also reported the negative impact of Long Covid on their work, the lack of employment support available, mistreatment from colleagues, and dismissal of professional knowledge. ConclusionOur findings highlight a range of barriers to accessing adequate Long Covid care, with women, ethnic minorities and people with co-occurring conditions experiencing intersectional stigma. We recommend a move towards a healthcare system that is sensitive to intersectional disparities in access to care and is mindful of how stigma can reinforce these inequalities. This would speak to removing barriers to care and foster a more positive experience for people living with Long Covid already disadvantaged by structural and systemic discrimination.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 97%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 97%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 98%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 98%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 98%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 97%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 96%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 96%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 97%
- Is my cough a cold or covid? A qualitative study of COVID-19 symptom recognition and attitudes towards testing in the UK 95%
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.