Back

Regimen comprising clarithromycin, clofazimine and bedaquiline is more efficacious than monotherapy in a mouse model of chronic Mycobacterium avium lung infection

Rimal, B.; Howe, R. A.; Panthi, C. M.; Lamichhane, G.

2024-12-11 microbiology
10.1101/2024.12.11.627976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mycobacterium avium, a leading non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) pathogen, causes chronic pulmonary infections, particularly in individuals with underlying lung conditions or immunosuppression. Current treatments involve prolonged multi-drug regimens with poor outcomes and significant side effects, highlighting the urgent need for improved therapies. Using a BALB/c mouse model of chronic M. avium pulmonary disease, we evaluated the efficacy of individual antibiotics-- clarithromycin, clofazimine, and rifabutin--and combination regimens including clarithromycin+bedaquiline and clarithromycin+clofazimine+bedaquiline. Clarithromycin demonstrated potent bactericidal activity, reducing lung bacterial burden by 2.2 log10 CFU, while clofazimine transitioned from bacteriostatic to bactericidal, achieving a 1.7 log10 CFU reduction. Rifabutin was bacteriostatic against M. avium MAC 101 but ineffective against MAC 104. The triple-drug regimen of clarithromycin+clofazimine+bedaquiline was the most effective, achieving a 3.3 log10 CFU reduction in bacterial load, with 98% clearance within the first week and continued efficacy over eight weeks. Gross pathology confirmed these results, with granulomatous lesions observed only in untreated or rifabutin-treated mice. Combination therapy demonstrated enhanced efficacy compared to monotherapy. The findings underscore the potential of oral clarithromycin+clofazimine+bedaquiline or clarithromycin+clofazimine regimen as a promising therapeutic strategy for M. avium pulmonary disease.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.